The GDELT Project

The Growing Trend & Vast Dangers Of Outsourcing Decisions To LLMs

Not a day goes by the last few months were I don't receive at least a dozen pitches from various companies, large and small, touting their LLM-based solutions as a way of replacing human workers and human decision making. Early pitches at least centered on more realistic (though dangerous) machine-assisted customer support applications, such as LLM-driven recommender chat apps and combining voice transcription with realtime LLM processing to provide relevant information to support representatives live on calls. Then came the predictable second wave of solutions that simply replaced humans entirely, relying exclusively on LLMs to provide all frontline customer support. Remarkably, I even received one pitch by way of a major European municipality touting how it had replaced much of its army of constituent services staff with LLM-powered automated chatbots and voicebots and how it saw LLMs as a pathway to almost entirely eliminating constituent-facing human staff from government offices. Since then I've received dozens of similar pitches from startups working with governments across the continent and the cost savings they've achieved by replacing government workers with AI. Given Europe's historically protectionist approach to technology, the breathtaking pace at which it is ripping all of that down is simply astounding.

However, it is the newer wave of solution pitches that are giving the greatest pause. Below are just a small handful of some of the more noteworthy trends of my daily emails. The fact that even libraries and dry cleaners are now being subjected to the LLM treatment suggests the LLM craze has truly "jumped the shark".

While some of them may border on the absurd, that isn't stopping organizations and governments rushing to replace humans with LLMs in the misguided belief that LLMs can truly think and reason and yield bias-free and error-free flawless performance.