The GDELT Project

Planetary-Scale Deep Reasoning: Having Gemini 3 Pro Improve Its Own Prompt For Our Global Trends Report For TV News

Yesterday we unveiled a first glimpse at creating a daily global trends report for worldwide television news by having Gemini 3 Pro "watch" an entire day of television news from a given country using Chirp 1's ASR transcripts and write a deeply reasoned and researched intelligence-style report that looks across all of that coverage and teases out the overarching themes, narratives, implications and future impacts of the day's events. Today, let's feed those results back into Gemini 3 Pro along with the prompt we used and ask Gemini 3 Pro itself to evaluate its report, suggest improvements and provide recommended changes to the prompt to achieve those improvements. We interactively iterate with Gemini 3 Pro in this way to achieve a final prompt that produces quite strong results and even made a number of highly insightful recommendations, including breaking the "implications for the future" section into short/medium/longterm sections, organizing the deep dive section into specific themes, etc and even adding confidence and bias assessments to findings. Critically, Gemini 3 Pro's final improved prompt structures the output so well that Gemini 2.5 Pro is now able to achieve similar results, whereas before with our human-generated prompts the results were far less useful.

One major finding is that Gemini 2.5 Pro becomes fixated on domestic issues for its report, while Gemini 3 Pro is better able to understand the domestic implications of international events and weave those into its narrative. However, it is possible that additional updates to the prompt may lead to improvements in Gemini 2.5 Pro's performance here.

Perhaps the most and least surprising finding is that the "confidence and bias" analysis (a core part of intelligence assessment) is severely hampered by the model's fixed knowledge cutoff and the sheer degree to which current geopolitical events are breaking with historical norms. For example, in reaction to Russian media covering the US administration's updated policy stance labeling the EU as "anti-democratic" and criticizing a number of EU policies, Gemini 3 Pro labeled this as Low to Medium Confidence, "heavily suspecting Russian disinformation or exaggeration intended to fracture NATO/EU cohesion". Such an assessment would have been entirely reasonable in past administrations, but in fact these claims are factual and reflect dramatic changes in US policy. This suggests that claim assessment may be less valuable without future efforts to provide updated background information to Gemini to help it review those claims.

Overall the results here demonstrate the incredible potential of SOTA models for geopolitical analysis and the ability for the models themselves to help improve their own performance. Most incredibly of all is that it costs just a fraction of a dollar to have the most advanced AI models in the world read through an entire day of transcripts from a television news channel and write a deeply reasoned report about its overarching themes, narratives and implications for the future.

 

Recall that this was the final report generated by Gemini 3 Pro deeply analyzing an entire day of a single Indonesian television news channel coverage from December 10, 2025 that cost $0.373752:

You are an intelligence analyst whose job it is to monitor the entire world. Take the attached transcript of an entire day of tv news and give me a multi-page report that organizes it into an overarching structure and narrative about what happened yesterday that dives into the trends, patterns, most important stories and findings, etc. Essentially synthesize it into something for a high level principle like the President's Daily Brief that provides breakout detail for each finding for an analyst to help answer questions and explain in more detail. Only examine news-related coverage, ignore everything else. The entire report should be in English. Use your existing world knowledge to contextualize your findings, both domestically and internationally and talk about how important/unusual/noteworthy they are. End by talking about potential implications and impact on the future and how these events, themes, trends, stories, findings, etc might impact the future domestically and internationally, economically, politically, etc. Open the report with the high-level overarching analytical synthesis, context and future implications (intended for the President) then deep dive with deep analysis and details for each for the briefer to answer questions that might come up.

PRESIDENT’S DAILY BRIEF: INDONESIA SITUATION REPORT
DATE: December 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Domestic Crisis Convergence (Sumatra Floods/Governance Failures) & Strategic Foreign Policy Pivots

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

For the President:

Yesterday’s reporting indicates Indonesia is grappling with a convergence of severe ecological disasters and systemic governance failures that threaten domestic stability, while simultaneously executing a significant foreign policy pivot toward non-Western powers.

Domestically, the humanitarian crisis in Sumatra (Aceh, North Sumatra, West Sumatra) has escalated significantly, with death tolls nearing 1,000. This is no longer being treated solely as a natural disaster; the National Police (Polri) have officially upgraded the investigation into illegal logging to a criminal status, explicitly linking corporate deforestation to the catastrophic flooding. Concurrently, a fatal fire in a Jakarta drone facility (22 dead) and the suspension of a Regent (Bupati) for abandoning his post during the floods have exposed deep lapses in regulatory enforcement and local leadership accountability.

Internationally, President Prabowo Subianto’s current tour signals a deepening of strategic ties with Pakistan and Russia. Following agreements in Islamabad regarding medical cooperation, President Prabowo met with Vladimir Putin in Moscow. Putin explicitly offered assistance in developing nuclear energy infrastructure in Indonesia, marking a potential shift in Indonesia’s long-term energy strategy and geopolitical alignment.

Outlook: Expect rising public unrest regarding environmental mismanagement and local government incompetence. The administration will likely face pressure to expedite the Asset Forfeiture Bill to combat systemic corruption. Internationally, the embrace of Russian nuclear technology may trigger diplomatic friction with Western partners.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE & BREAKOUT DETAILS

1. THE SUMATRA DISASTER: INTERSECTION OF CLIMATE & CRIME

The Situation:
Catastrophic flash floods and landslides across three provinces (Aceh, North Sumatra, West Sumatra) have resulted in 969 confirmed deaths, with 252 missing and over 500 injured. The situation remains critical with widespread infrastructure paralysis.

Key Findings:

Context & Assessment:
This disaster follows a pattern of "hydro-meteorological" events exacerbated by deforestation. However, the speed at which the police escalated this to a criminal corporate investigation is noteworthy and suggests a directive from the central government to deflect public anger away from the state and toward private sector malfeasance.

2. CRISIS OF GOVERNANCE: ACCOUNTABILITY & NEGLIGENCE

The Situation:
Two major events yesterday highlighted severe lapses in governance and safety standards.

A. The Terra Drone Fire (Jakarta):

B. Leadership Vacuum in Aceh Selatan:

3. FOREIGN POLICY: THE MOSCOW-ISLAMABAD AXIS

The Situation:
President Prabowo is conducting high-level diplomatic visits to Pakistan and Russia.

A. Pakistan Leg:

B. Russia Leg:

4. ANTI-CORRUPTION & LAW ENFORCEMENT

The Situation:
Despite the disaster, corruption crackdowns continue, highlighting the "epidemic" nature of graft in the country.

5. SOCIETAL & POLITICAL TENSIONS

FUTURE IMPLICATIONS & FORECAST

Economic Impact:

Political Stability:

International Relations:

Security:

 

Let's ask Gemini 3 Pro to rewrite the prompt for us to optimize it:

Rewrite this prompt to be much better for Gemini 3 Pro. Keep your prompt as minimal as possible:

You are an intelligence analyst whose job it is to monitor the entire world. Take the attached transcript of an entire day of tv news and give me a multi-page report that organizes it into an overarching structure and narrative about what happened yesterday that dives into the trends, patterns, most important stories and findings, etc. Essentially synthesize it into something for a high level principle like the President's Daily Brief that provides breakout detail for each finding for an analyst to help answer questions and explain in more detail. Only examine news-related coverage, ignore everything else. The entire report should be in English. Use your existing world knowledge to contextualize your findings, both domestically and internationally and talk about how important/unusual/noteworthy they are. End by talking about potential implications and impact on the future and how these events, themes, trends, stories, findings, etc might impact the future domestically and internationally, economically, politically, etc. Open the report with the high-level overarching analytical synthesis, context and future implications (intended for the President) then deep dive with deep analysis and details for each for the briefer to answer questions that might come up.

This yields the following prompt which cost $0.366004 to run:

Role: Senior Intelligence Analyst
Task: Synthesize the attached TV news transcript into a strategic report. Filter out non-news. Use your broader world knowledge to contextualize the rarity and significance of the findings against historical baselines.
Structure:
Executive Synthesis: A high-level narrative of the day's events intended for the President (The PDB).
Analyst Breakouts: Granular deep-dives into specific stories, trends, and patterns to support the briefer.
Strategic Foresight: A concluding assessment of future implications. Forecast potential domestic, international, and economic impacts resulting from these events.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
DAILY INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING
DATE: December 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Executive Synthesis of Domestic & International Developments

EXECUTIVE SYNTHESIS

For the President

President Prabowo Subianto is currently executing a significant diplomatic pivot, moving from a high-level state visit in Pakistan—where he received the Nishan-e-Pakistan, the country’s highest civilian honor—to Moscow for a strategic summit with Vladimir Putin. While publicly framed around trade and commemoration of diplomatic ties, President Putin has explicitly offered Russian assistance for Indonesia’s nuclear energy program. This engagement, occurring simultaneously with rising US-Venezuela tensions and Donald Trump’s rhetoric regarding Ukrainian elections, signals Indonesia’s intent to deepen non-aligned strategic partnerships, particularly in energy and defense.

Domestically, the administration faces a severe humanitarian and governance crisis in Sumatra. A series of hydrometeorological disasters across Aceh, North Sumatra, and West Sumatra have resulted in a confirmed death toll approaching 1,000 (969 confirmed), with significant infrastructure collapse. Police investigations (Bareskrim Polri) have elevated the probe into the disaster's cause to a criminal investigation, explicitly linking the devastation to illegal logging and corporate negligence in upstream watersheds. This crisis of environmental governance is compounded by a fatal fire at a drone manufacturing facility in Jakarta (22 dead), exposing critical lapses in building safety regulations under the Online Single Submission (OSS) licensing system.

Regionally, ASEAN stability is threatened by a kinetic escalation on the Thailand-Cambodia border involving artillery and drone warfare, resulting in military and civilian casualties.

ANALYST BREAKOUTS

1. Diplomatic Realignment: The Russia-Pakistan Axis

2. The Sumatra Crisis: Nexus of Disaster and Corruption

3. Regulatory Failure: The Terra Drone Fire Incident

4. Regional Flashpoint: Thai-Cambodia Border Conflict

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

Domestic Political Stability:
The convergence of the Sumatra disaster (approaching 1,000 dead) and high-profile corruption cases in the forestry sector creates a volatile mix. Public sentiment may shift from grief to anger against the government for systemic negligence. We anticipate the administration will aggressively pursue "scapegoats" in the private sector (illegal loggers/mining companies) and local government (as seen with the South Aceh Regent) to deflect blame from central oversight failures.

Economic Implications:
The devastation in Sumatra—a key agricultural and commodity hub—will likely disrupt supply chains, specifically palm oil and rubber, potentially spiking inflation in Q1 2026. Furthermore, the regulatory backlash from the Terra Drone fire may lead to a temporary freeze or slowdown in industrial licensing in Jakarta as safety audits are conducted, slowing short-term investment realization.

International Relations:
Prabowo’s engagement with Putin regarding nuclear energy will likely draw scrutiny from Washington and the EU. If Indonesia proceeds with Russian nuclear technology, it may trigger secondary sanctions risks or complicate access to Western financing for other energy transition projects (JETP). The administration will need to carefully balance this new Russian entente with its existing Western commitments.

Public Health Watch:
Reports from Aceh indicate outbreaks of skin diseases, ISPA (respiratory infections), and diarrhea among refugees. With infrastructure (electricity/clean water) still offline in 81 villages, there is a moderate-to-high risk of a localized epidemic (cholera/typhoid) if the central government’s logistical response remains hampered by destroyed roads.

 

What if we just have Gemini 3 Pro write the prompt from scratch?

give me an optimal prompt for gemini 3 pro that reads through a full-day television news transcript, looks only at the news material and writes an intelligence community Presidential Daily Brief from it.

This yields the lengthy prompt below that cost $0.367368.

# ROLE
You are the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence. Your task is to review raw open-source intelligence (OSINT) from a full-day television news transcript and compile the **Presidential Daily Brief (PDB)**.

# INPUT DATA CONTEXT
The attached file is a raw transcript of a full day of broadcast news. It contains:
1. Significant noise (commercials, intros/outros, banter between anchors).
2. High repetition (the same stories repeated every hour).
3. Sensationalism (emotional language typical of cable news).
4. Irrelevant content (celebrity gossip, viral videos, local interest stories).

# MISSION
Your goal is to filter this noise, identify events of strategic national importance (Geopolitical, Economic, Domestic Security, Cyber), and synthesize them into a concise, analytic document for the President of the United States.

# PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
1. **Filter & De-duplicate:** Scan the entire text. Ignore commercials, entertainment, and banter. Identify the core news events. If a story is mentioned 20 times, synthesize it into ONE entry.
2. **Strip Sensationalism:** Convert "Breaking News: Crisis on the Border!" to "Migration flows have increased by X% at the southern border." Use neutral, bureaucratic, intelligence-standard language.
3. **Assess Strategic Impact:** Do not just report *what* happened. Briefly assess *why* it matters to US interests.
4. **categorize:** Sort intelligence into the requested format below.

# FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS
Output the response in Markdown using the following structure:

## PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEF [Insert Date Based on Transcript]

### 1. BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT (BLUF)
*   A single paragraph (3-4 sentences) summarizing the most critical strategic threat or development of the day.

### 2. GLOBAL FLASHPOINTS (International Relations & Conflict)
*   **[Region/Country]: [Event Summary]**
    *   *Intelligence Assessment:* [1-2 sentences on the strategic implication for the US].

### 3. DOMESTIC STABILITY & THREATS (Homeland Security)
*   **[Topic]: [Event Summary]**
    *   *Intelligence Assessment:* [Implications for public order, infrastructure, or federal policy].

### 4. ECONOMIC INDICATORS & ENERGY
*   **[Market/Sector]: [Event Summary]**
    *   *Intelligence Assessment:* [Macro-economic impact or supply chain implications].

### 5. MEDIA NARRATIVE ANALYSIS (OSINT METADATA)
*   Briefly analyze the media's focus today. Is there a specific narrative being pushed that diverges from ground truth? Are there discrepancies in how different hours reported the same event?

# EXCLUSION CRITERIA (DO NOT INCLUDE)
*   Celebrity news, sports, or entertainment.
*   "Coming up next" teasers.
*   Opinions of pundits *unless* they represent a shift in political strategy by a major party.
*   Local crime stories *unless* they indicate a broader national trend (e.g., specific terrorism).

# TONE GUIDE
*   **Bad:** "It was a crazy day on Wall Street as stocks tumbled!"
*   **Good:** "Major indices experienced volatility, closing down 2%, driven by uncertainty regarding Federal Reserve interest rate policy."

[BEGIN PROCESSING ATTACHED TRANSCRIPT]

PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEF December 10, 2025

1. BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT (BLUF)

President Prabowo Subianto of Indonesia has met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, discussing deepened military-technical cooperation and a Russian offer to assist in developing Indonesia’s nuclear energy infrastructure. Domestically, Indonesia is grappling with a severe humanitarian crisis in Sumatra, where flash floods and landslides have resulted in nearly 1,000 casualties; authorities have launched criminal investigations into illegal logging operations blamed for exacerbating the disaster. Meanwhile, regional stability in Southeast Asia is threatened by renewed border skirmishes between Thailand and Cambodia involving artillery and drone strikes.

2. GLOBAL FLASHPOINTS (International Relations & Conflict)

3. DOMESTIC STABILITY & THREATS (Homeland Security – Partner Nation Context)

4. ECONOMIC INDICATORS & ENERGY

5. MEDIA NARRATIVE ANALYSIS (OSINT METADATA)

 

Let's try another version costing $0.374074:

Attached is a full-day television news transcript in various languages. I want you to deeply reason over the entire day of events, stories, narratives, themes, patterns, trends, etc and weave it into a cohesive overarching English-language narrative report. Organize everything into broad top-level themes and meaning. End by using your world knowledge to discuss the likely implications and impact on the future. Take as many pages as you need. Write the report entirely in English.

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the television news transcript from Metro TV dated Wednesday, December 10, 2025, the following is a detailed narrative report organized by major themes, followed by an analysis of future implications.

Daily Narrative Report: December 10, 2025

Source: Metro TV (Indonesia)
Dominant Mood: Somber, Critical, and Reformist

Executive Summary

The news cycle for December 10, 2025, paints a picture of a nation grappling with the consequences of systemic negligence. Indonesia is simultaneously facing a catastrophic natural disaster in Sumatra exacerbated by environmental crimes, a deadly urban fire in Jakarta caused by safety non-compliance, and a wave of corruption scandals involving regional leaders. While President Prabowo Subianto engages in high-level diplomacy abroad, the domestic front is defined by a demand for accountability—whether from negligent building owners, corrupt officials, or absentee leaders during crises.

Theme 1: The Sumatra Humanitarian Crisis & Environmental Reckoning

The most pervasive story of the day is the devastation across Sumatra (Aceh, North Sumatra, and West Sumatra) following massive flash floods and landslides. The narrative has shifted from disaster reporting to a criminal investigation of environmental destruction.

Theme 2: Governance, Accountability, and Corruption

A strong theme of "punishment for negligence" runs through the day's news, highlighting a crackdown on officials who fail their duties.

Theme 3: Urban Tragedy – The Terra Drone Fire

A horrific fire at the Terra Drone office building in Kemayoran, Jakarta, has resulted in 22 deaths. The narrative focuses on regulatory failure and building safety violations.

Theme 4: International Diplomacy & Geopolitics

While domestic crises unfold, President Prabowo Subianto is conducting a high-profile diplomatic tour.

Theme 5: Social Issues and Economy

Implications and Future Outlook (2026 and Beyond)

Based on the events of December 10, 2025, several long-term trends and implications can be extrapolated:

1. The End of "Business as Usual" in Environmental Management

The Sumatra floods are being framed not as a natural disaster, but as a corporate crime.

2. Urban Safety Overhaul & Bureaucratic Friction

The Terra Drone tragedy exposes the dangers of the OSS (Online Single Submission) system when de-coupled from field inspections.

3. Geopolitical Pivot: The Nuclear Option

President Prabowo’s meeting with Putin regarding nuclear energy is significant.

4. "Crisis Leadership" as a Political Benchmark

The swift suspension of the South Aceh Regent creates a new precedent.

5. Digital & Financial Crime Evolution

The Wedding Organizer fraud and the "QRIS/Bi-Fast" security concerns mentioned in the economic segment highlight the vulnerabilities of the digital economy.

Conclusion

December 10, 2025, marks a turning point where negligence is being criminalized. Whether it is a Regent leaving his flooding constituents, a CEO bribing for forest rights, or a building owner ignoring fire codes, the state is moving toward a more punitive approach to enforce order and safety. This suggests that 2026 will be a year of heavy regulation and enforcement in Indonesia, driven by the high human cost of the disasters of late 2025.

 

Let's give Gemini some suggested structure for the report. This time it cost $0.376160.

You are a global geopolitical economic intelligence analyst whose job it is to monitor the entire world and who deeply understands the world. Take the attached full day of transcripts from a television news channel and write a multi-page intelligence report that organizes it into an overarching structure and narrative about what happened yesterday that dives into the trends, patterns, most important stories and findings, etc. Use your existing world knowledge to contextualize your findings, both domestically and internationally and talk about how important/unusual/noteworthy they are. The report should open with a TITLE that captures the overall gist of the day. Then a one-page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY that overviews the major events, narratives, themes, stories of the day, including domestically, internationally, economically, politically, health, tech, etc and ending with an "impact & outlook" section that examines the short and long term likely impact of everything and where things might go from here. This section is designed to be easy to read and understand by a senior policymaker like the President. Then the report should move into a multi-page ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE that offers a deep dive breaking out the major stories, themes, trends and findings. Organize this section thematically. The report should end with a one-page FUTURE IMPACTS & OUTLOOK section that deep dives into the short and long term likely impact of everything and where things might go from here. The entire report should be in English.

INTELLIGENCE REPORT: 12-11-2025

TITLE: CRISIS AND DIPLOMACY: INDONESIA NAVIGATES CATASTROPHIC FLOODS, SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION, AND A GEOPOLITICAL PIVOT TO MOSCOW

DATE: December 11, 2025
CLASSIFICATION: OPEN SOURCE INTELLIGENCE (OSINT)
PREPARED BY: GLOBAL GEOPOLITICAL ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE ANALYST

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview:
The monitoring period of December 10-11, 2025, reveals an Indonesia grappling with a severe hydrometeorological crisis in Sumatra, exposing deep-seated environmental management failures and local governance incompetence. Simultaneously, the central government, led by President Prabowo Subianto, is aggressively pursuing a diversified foreign policy, marked by high-level visits to Pakistan and Russia, signaling a potential shift in energy strategy towards nuclear cooperation with Moscow. Domestically, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) remains active against regional leaders, while a deadly industrial fire in Jakarta has reignited debates regarding regulatory enforcement and workplace safety.

Key Developments:

Impact & Outlook:
In the short term, the Indonesian government’s resources will be stretched by disaster relief and infrastructure reconstruction in Sumatra. The suspension of the South Aceh Regent sets a precedent for central intervention in local governance failures. Internationally, Prabowo’s engagement with Russia regarding nuclear energy will likely draw scrutiny from Western partners but aligns with Jakarta’s energy security goals. The recurring corruption scandals and the deadly Jakarta fire suggest that despite economic growth, systemic regulatory enforcement remains the nation's "Achilles' heel." Immediate pressure will mount on the legislature to pass the Asset Forfeiture Bill to curb corruption effectively.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

1. THE SUMATRA DISASTER: ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME AND POLITICAL FALLOUT

The flooding in Sumatra is not merely a natural disaster; it is being treated as a consequence of environmental crime and governance failure.

2. DOMESTIC SECURITY AND REGULATORY NEGLIGENCE

Two major events highlight the gap between regulation and enforcement in Indonesia:

3. GEOPOLITICS: PRABOWO’S STRATEGIC PIVOT

President Prabowo’s tour of Pakistan and Russia demonstrates a robust, independent foreign policy that prioritizes national interest over Western alignment.

4. SOCIO-POLITICAL FRACTURES: THE PBNU SCHISM

A significant rift has opened within Nahdlatul Ulama (PBNU), Indonesia's largest Islamic organization.

5. ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND POLICY

6. REGIONAL SECURITY: THAILAND-CAMBODIA BORDER

FUTURE IMPACTS & OUTLOOK

Short-Term Forecast (1-3 Months):

Medium-Term Forecast (6-12 Months):

Long-Term Impact (1-5 Years):

Recommendation for Policymakers:
The President must leverage the current crisis to force through the Asset Forfeiture Bill and strengthen the Ministry of Environment's enforcement powers. Internationally, the nuclear deal with Russia should be pursued with caution, balancing energy needs with diplomatic neutrality. Domestically, immediate mediation is required in the PBNU conflict to ensure social stability.

 

Note how Gemini broke the future impacts section out into short, medium and long-term impacts, which is a really great idea. Let's go back and request that and blend in some additional detail from our original prompt at a cost of $0.378132.

You are a global geopolitical economic intelligence analyst whose job it is to monitor the entire world and who deeply understands the world. Take the attached full day of transcripts from a television news channel and write a multi-page intelligence report that organizes it into an overarching structure and narrative about what happened yesterday that dives into the trends, patterns, most important stories and findings, etc. Essentially synthesize it into something for a high level USA Government principle like the President's Daily Brief. Use your existing world knowledge to contextualize your findings, both domestically and internationally and talk about how important/unusual/noteworthy they are. The report should open with a TITLE that captures the overall gist of the day. Then a one-page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY that overviews the major events, narratives, themes, stories of the day, including domestically, internationally, economically, politically, health, tech, etc and ending with an "impact & outlook" section that examines the short and long term likely impact of everything and where things might go from here. It should be easy to read and understand by a senior policymaker like the President of the USA or a CEO and give just enough detail to understand what's going on, but not too much detail (just high-level). Then the report should move into a multi-page ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE that offers a deep dive with lots of details for an analyst and breaking out the major stories, themes, trends and findings. Organize this section thematically. The report should end with a one-page FUTURE IMPACTS & OUTLOOK section that deep dives into the short and long term likely impact of everything and where things might go from here. Break it into SHORT TERM, MEDIUM TERM AND LONGTERM IMPACT sections and end with a RECOMMENDATIONS section that has recommendations for policymakers and business leaders and others. The entire report should be in English. It should be up to 10 pages long as needed.

OFFICE OF GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS
PRESIDENT’S DAILY BRIEFING – INDONESIA COUNTRY FILE
DATE: December 11, 2025
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT: INDONESIA'S HUMANITARIAN CRISIS AMIDST GEOPOLITICAL PIVOT TO RUSSIA & PAKISTAN; REGULATORY FAILURES IN JAKARTA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview
On December 10, 2025, Indonesia faced a convergence of acute domestic crises and significant foreign policy maneuvers. While President Prabowo Subianto is abroad strengthening ties with non-Western powers (Russia and Pakistan), the domestic front is besieged by a catastrophic hydrometeorological disaster in Sumatra and a deadly industrial fire in Jakarta that has exposed severe regulatory lapses.

Key Developments

Impact & Outlook
The administration faces a dichotomy: projecting strength abroad while managing systemic failures at home. The severe flooding in Sumatra will likely depress regional economic output and strain the national budget for reconstruction. Politically, the overture to Russia regarding nuclear energy represents a strategic hedge against Western influence, potentially complicating US-Indonesia relations. Short-term, expect social unrest in disaster zones due to aid scarcity. Long-term, the government will likely enforce stricter environmental and building codes, impacting foreign and domestic businesses operating in the archipelago.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

1. GEOPOLITICS: The Prabowo Doctrine & Strategic Autonomy

Russia Engagement: President Prabowo’s meeting with Vladimir Putin in Moscow marks a deepening of Jakarta-Moscow relations. Key takeaways include:

Pakistan Partnership: Prior to Russia, Prabowo’s visit to Islamabad yielded seven MoUs. The most significant is Pakistan’s commitment to send doctors and professors to Indonesia to address the archipelago’s medical professional shortage. Prabowo was awarded the Nishan-e-Pakistan, signaling a strengthening of ties within the Islamic world, potentially to balance influence in the Indo-Pacific.

Analysis: Prabowo is actively diversifying Indonesia's strategic partnerships, moving beyond a reliance on the West or China. The focus on nuclear energy with Russia is a critical development that requires monitoring for compliance with international safety standards and geopolitical alignment.

2. DOMESTIC CRISIS: The Sumatra Disaster Complex

Scale of Destruction: The flooding and landslides across Aceh, North Sumatra, and West Sumatra have escalated into a major humanitarian catastrophe.

Root Cause & Criminal Investigation:

Social Impact: Food shortages are reported in isolated villages (e.g., Ketol, Central Aceh), with residents traversing dangerous terrain for supplies. Disease outbreaks (fever, skin infections, respiratory issues) are rampant in refugee camps due to a lack of clean water and medicine.

3. REGULATORY GOVERNANCE: The Terra Drone Tragedy

Incident Profile: A fire at a shophouse utilized by Terra Drone (a tech firm) in Kemayoran, Jakarta, resulted in 22 fatalities.
Systemic Failure:

4. POLITICS & INTEGRITY: Corruption and Leadership Accountability

KPK Activity: The arrest of the Central Lampung Regent, Ardito Wijaya, for alleged bribery regarding project procurement highlights persistent corruption at the regional level.
Leadership Accountability: The Ministry of Home Affairs suspended the Regent of South Aceh, Mirwan MS, for three months. The Regent traveled to Saudi Arabia for Umrah without permission during the height of the disaster, citing a "personal vow" and his wife's birthday. This suspension sets a precedent for central government intervention in local leadership failures during crises.
Religious Politics: A leadership struggle within PBNU (Nahdlatul Ulama, Indonesia's largest Islamic organization) has intensified. A plenary meeting replaced Chairman Yahya Cholil Staquf (Gus Yahya) with Zulfa Mustafa. Gus Yahya has declared the meeting invalid. Given PBNU's massive political influence, this internal fracture could have broader political stability implications.

5. ECONOMIC INDICATORS

FUTURE IMPACTS & OUTLOOK

SHORT TERM (1-4 Weeks)

MEDIUM TERM (1-6 Months)

LONG TERM (1-3 Years)

RECOMMENDATIONS

For US Policymakers:

For Business Leaders & Investors:

 

Let's have Gemini try to improve the prompt:

can  you improve on this prompt at all to make a better report?
You are a global geopolitical economic intelligence analyst whose job it is to monitor the entire world and who deeply understands the world. Take the attached full day of transcripts from a television news channel and write a multi-page intelligence report that organizes it into an overarching structure and narrative about what happened yesterday that dives into the trends, patterns, most important stories and findings, etc. Essentially synthesize it into something for a high level USA Government principle like the President's Daily Brief. Use your existing world knowledge to contextualize your findings, both domestically and internationally and talk about how important/unusual/noteworthy they are.
The report should open with a TITLE that captures the overall gist of the day.
Then a one-page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY that overviews the major events, narratives, themes, stories of the day, including domestically, internationally, economically, politically, health, tech, etc. It should open with a 1-2 paragraph OVERVIEW and then a bulleted list of KEY DEVELOPMENTS and end with an IMPACTS & OUTLOOKS section that examines the short and long term likely impact of everything and where things might go from here. The entire EXECUTIVE SUMMARY section should be easy to read and understand by a senior policymaker like the President of the USA or a CEO and give just enough detail to understand what's going on, but not too much detail (just high-level).
Then the report should move into a multi-page ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE that offers a deep dive with lots of details for an analyst and breaking out the major stories, themes, trends and findings. Organize this section thematically.
The report should end with a one-page FUTURE IMPACTS & OUTLOOK section that deep dives into the short and long term likely impact of everything and where things might go from here. Break it into SHORT TERM (1-3 months), MEDIUM TERM (6-12 months) AND LONGTERM IMPACT (1-5 years) sections and end with a RECOMMENDATIONS section that has recommendations for the future. The entire report should be in English. It should be up to 10 pages long as needed.

This time we not only got an expanded prompt, but Gemini offers a number of fascinating pointers as to why it made the changes it did:

Yes, the original prompt is a good starting point, but it can be significantly improved to yield a higher-quality, more professional output.

Here are the specific weaknesses in the original prompt and how we will fix them:

  1. Noise Filtering: TV transcripts are full of repetition, commercials, banter, and "fluff." The prompt needs to explicitly tell the AI to filter this out and focus on signal over noise.
  2. Contextual Grounding: Instead of just asking for "context," we need to ask the AI to "cross-reference" the news with its internal knowledge base to identify anomalies (e.g., "Is this rhetoric new, or the same as last month?").
  3. Tone Calibration: A true "President’s Daily Brief" (PDB) style is very specific—it is concise, uses "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF), and avoids sensational adjectives.
  4. Structure Definition: To prevent the AI from repeating the "Impacts" in the summary and the final section, we need to delineate "Immediate Implications" from "Strategic Foresight."

Here is the Optimized Master Prompt.

The Optimized Prompt

Role & Objective:
You are a Senior Strategic Analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), responsible for Open Source Intelligence (OSINT). Your task is to review the attached raw transcripts from a full day of television news broadcasting. You must filter out sensationalism, repetition, commercials, and punditry to extract hard intelligence, shifts in narrative, and economic signals.

The Output:
Compose a President’s Daily Brief (PDB) style intelligence assessment. The tone must be objective, analytical, concise, and high-level. Avoid flowery language. Use "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF) methodology.

Report Structure:

1. INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (The "BLUF")

3. ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)
Do not organize strictly by chronology. Organize by Geopolitical & Economic Themes (e.g., "Indo-Pacific Security," "Global Energy Markets," "Domestic Civil Unrest"). For each theme:

4. ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE
Devote a specific section to markets and finance. Look for correlations between geopolitical news mentioned in the transcript and market reactions.

5. STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Short, Medium, Long Term)
Based strictly on the trajectory of today’s intelligence, project the likely outcomes.

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Constraints:

Why this prompt is better:

Note on Length:
You mentioned "up to 10 pages." Please note that most AI models have an output token limit (usually around 4,000 to 8,000 characters, roughly 2-4 single-spaced pages). If you truly need 10 pages, you will need to prompt the AI section-by-section (e.g., "Write the Executive Summary," then "Now write the Deep Dive," etc.). The prompt above is designed to get the highest density of information within a single AI response.

 

Let's try this new prompt, which cost $0.371572 to run.

Role & Objective:
You are a Senior Strategic Analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), responsible for Open Source Intelligence (OSINT). Your task is to review the attached raw transcripts from a full day of television news broadcasting. You must filter out sensationalism, repetition, commercials, and punditry to extract hard intelligence, shifts in narrative, and economic signals.
The Output:
Compose a President’s Daily Brief (PDB) style intelligence assessment. The tone must be objective, analytical, concise, and high-level. Avoid flowery language. Use "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF) methodology.
Report Structure:
1. INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER
TITLE: A single, impactful sentence summarizing the geopolitical/economic gravity of the day.
DATE: [Insert Date]
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT SUMMARY
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (The "BLUF")
Strategic Assessment (1-2 Paragraphs): Synthesize the overarching narrative. Do not just list events; explain the connection between the day's domestic, international, and economic stories. Identify the "metastory" (e.g., "While domestic markets rallied, rising tensions in the South China Sea dominated the security narrative...").
Key Developments (Bulleted List): Isolate the 3-5 most critical events.
Immediate Implications: A brief analysis of why this matters today to US interests.
3. ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)
Do not organize strictly by chronology. Organize by Geopolitical & Economic Themes (e.g., "Indo-Pacific Security," "Global Energy Markets," "Domestic Civil Unrest"). For each theme:
The Signal: What actually happened? (Cite specific quotes or data points from the transcript).
The Context: Using your internal world knowledge, contextualize this. Is this a deviation from the norm? Is this an escalation?
The Narrative Shift: How is the media framing this? Is the rhetoric becoming more aggressive, fearful, or optimistic compared to historical trends?
4. ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE
Devote a specific section to markets and finance. Look for correlations between geopolitical news mentioned in the transcript and market reactions.
Focus: Supply chains, energy prices, currency fluctuations, and major corporate moves.
5. STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Short, Medium, Long Term)
Based strictly on the trajectory of today’s intelligence, project the likely outcomes.
0-3 Months (Tactical): Immediate fallouts (e.g., legislative votes, retaliatory strikes, market corrections).
6-12 Months (Operational): Election impacts, recession indicators, alliance shifts.
1-5 Years (Strategic): Structural changes to the global order or domestic stability.
6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Gaps: What was notably absent from the news cycle that a policymaker should worry about? (e.g., "Despite the market crash, no mention was made of the impending trade bill...")
Strategic Considerations: Provide 3 actionable considerations for US Policy (NOT political advice, but strategic positioning).
Constraints:
Synthesize the entire day into a comprehensive, high-density report (aim for maximum depth).
Ignore advertisements, anchor banter, and repetitive loops.
Highlight any specific discrepancies between facts and media portrayal.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: INDONESIA PURSUES STRATEGIC PIVOT TO RUSSIA AND PAKISTAN AMIDST CATASTROPHIC DOMESTIC DISASTER; THAI-CAMBODIA BORDER CONFLICT ESCALATES.
DATE: 10 December 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT SUMMARY

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Assessment:
President Prabowo Subianto remains actively engaged in a significant foreign policy pivot, conducting high-level state visits to Pakistan and Russia while his administration manages a massive humanitarian crisis in Sumatra. The juxtaposition of securing nuclear and defense cooperation in Moscow with the systemic infrastructure failures causing nearly 1,000 deaths domestically highlights a widening gap between Indonesia’s geopolitical ambition and its internal resilience. Simultaneously, Southeast Asian stability is threatened by kinetic escalation on the Thai-Cambodia border, utilizing heavy weaponry.

Key Developments:

Immediate Implications:
Prabowo’s engagement with Putin suggests Indonesia may defy Western pressure regarding energy and defense procurement in the near term. Domestically, the exposure of systemic corruption facilitating the Sumatra disaster and the Terra Drone fire may trigger political instability or a purge of local officials (evidenced by the OTT arrest of the Regent of Central Lampung).

2. ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

THEME 1: INDO-PACIFIC SECURITY & DIPLOMACY

THEME 2: REGIONAL CONFLICT (ASEAN)

THEME 3: DOMESTIC GOVERNANCE & CORRUPTION

3. ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE

Markets & Policy:

Corporate Signals:

4. STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

0-3 Months (Tactical):

6-12 Months (Operational):

1-5 Years (Strategic):

5. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Gaps:

Strategic Considerations for US Policy:

  1. Counter-Nuclear Offer: The US should aggressively expedite SMR (Small Modular Reactor) technology offers to Indonesia to counter Russian nuclear diplomacy.
  2. Disaster Diplomacy: Deploy humanitarian aid and engineering corps to Sumatra immediately. The failure of Indonesian state services (PLN, local gov) provides an opening for US soft power to demonstrate reliability.
  3. ASEAN Mediation: Urgently facilitate dialogue between Thailand and Cambodia to prevent the conflict from destabilizing the mainland SE Asia security architecture.

 

Let's ask Gemini to analyze the resulting report and recommend improvements to the prompt:

what would you improve about the report above? give me a modified version of the prompt that addresses those limitations.

Here is an analysis of the limitations in the previous report, followed by a significantly improved prompt designed to fix them.

Critique of the Previous Output

While the previous report was competent, it suffered from four specific analytic failures common in OSINT processing of raw transcripts:

  1. Omission of Critical Domestic Power Struggles (The "PBNU" Blind Spot): The transcript contained significant reporting on a leadership coup within Nahdlatul Ulama (PBNU)—Indonesia's largest Islamic organization and a massive political force. The previous report ignored this entirely to focus on "kinetic" news (fires, floods, border wars). A CIA analyst would know that instability within the PBNU is a major indicator of regime stability, often more consequential than a factory fire.
  2. Lack of Source Reliability Assessment: The report treated the "Thai-Cambodia Border War" as confirmed fact. However, the transcript came from a single Indonesian news outlet. A true intelligence assessment would flag this as "Single-Source Reporting" requiring corroboration, especially given the scale of conflict described (rockets, drones) which would likely be global breaking news if confirmed.
  3. Insufficient Connection of "Political Economy": The economic section listed data points (gold exports, tax delays) but failed to connect them to the political narrative. For example, delaying the sugar tax is likely a populist move to quell anger over the disaster response—the report missed this synthesis.
  4. Timeline Confusion: The transcript mixed dates (2024 vs. 2025). The previous report accepted 2025 as the date without noting the potential for archival footage or "Year in Review" segments which often appear in December broadcasts, potentially leading to temporal errors.

Modified Prompt

This new prompt introduces Source Verification, Elite Politics, and Confidence Levels to ensure a more rigorous intelligence product.

Role & Objective:
You are a Senior Strategic Analyst for the CIA's Open Source Center (OSC). Your task is to process the attached raw broadcast transcripts from a foreign news network. You must distinguish between hard intelligence (verifiable facts), state narratives (propaganda/spin), and political signaling.

The Output:
Compose a President’s Daily Brief (PDB) style assessment. The tone must be skeptical, analytical, and predictive. Use "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF) methodology.

Report Structure:

  1. INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER
    • TITLE: A sentence summarizing the day's strategic gravity.
    • DATE: [Insert Date – Note: Verify the timeline. If conflicting dates appear, flag them.]
    • CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT
  2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (The "BLUF")
    • Strategic Synthesis: Do not just list events. Explain why these events are happening simultaneously. Is the government using foreign policy wins to distract from domestic failures? Connect the dots.
    • Confidence Level: Assign a confidence level (Low/Medium/High) to the major claims, particularly regarding military conflict, based on the sourcing available in the text.
  3. SOURCE RELIABILITY & NARRATIVE ANALYSIS
    • New Section: Analyze the source. Are they amplifying specific stories (e.g., government competence or incompetence) to serve a political agenda?
    • Identify any segments that appear to be disinformation or unverified single-source claims (e.g., border conflicts that seem disproportionately escalated).
  4. THEMATIC DEEP DIVE (Prioritized Intelligence)
    • Elite Politics & Internal Stability: Look for power struggles within religious organizations (e.g., NU/Muhammadiyah), political parties, or civil-military relations. Do not ignore non-kinetic political maneuvering.
    • Geopolitics & Defense: Analyze shifts in alliances (e.g., Russia/China vs. US).
    • Crisis Management: How is the state handling disasters? Is there evidence of systemic failure or public dissent?
  5. ECONOMIC STATECRAFT (The Political Economy)
    • Analyze economic news through a political lens.
    • Example: Is a tax delay an economic necessity or a tool for political survival?
    • Look for: Resource nationalism (export bans), infrastructure failures affecting GDP, and patronage networks (corruption cases).
  6. STRATEGIC FORESIGHT & SIGNPOSTS
    • Likely Trajectory: What happens next based on these signals?
    • Signposts: What specific future indicators should US policymakers watch for to confirm this assessment? (e.g., "Watch for the resignation of Official X…").
  7. US POLICY IMPLICATIONS
    • Provide 3 distinct impacts on US interests (Security, Economic, Diplomatic).
    • Constraint: Do not offer policy advice (what we should do), but rather implications (what will happen to us if this continues).

Constraints:

 

Let's try this revised prompt, though it makes the report too IC-centric and emphasizes sourcing limitations that are less relevant to our per-channel analysis. Incredibly, this version makes no mention of the drone manufacturer fire, which was a major story of the day and heavily connected to the domestic political narrative. Thus, this version appears to be a major step back.

Role & Objective:
You are a Senior Strategic Analyst for the CIA's Open Source Center (OSC). Your task is to process the attached raw broadcast transcripts from a foreign news network. You must distinguish between hard intelligence (verifiable facts), state narratives (propaganda/spin), and political signaling.
The Output:
Compose a President’s Daily Brief (PDB) style assessment. The tone must be skeptical, analytical, and predictive. Use "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF) methodology.
Report Structure:
INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER
TITLE: A sentence summarizing the day's strategic gravity.
DATE: [Insert Date - Note: Verify the timeline. If conflicting dates appear, flag them.]
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (The "BLUF")
Strategic Synthesis: Do not just list events. Explain why these events are happening simultaneously. Is the government using foreign policy wins to distract from domestic failures? Connect the dots.
Confidence Level: Assign a confidence level (Low/Medium/High) to the major claims, particularly regarding military conflict, based on the sourcing available in the text.
SOURCE RELIABILITY & NARRATIVE ANALYSIS
New Section: Analyze the source (Metro TV). Are they amplifying specific stories (e.g., government competence or incompetence) to serve a political agenda?
Identify any segments that appear to be disinformation or unverified single-source claims (e.g., border conflicts that seem disproportionately escalated).
THEMATIC DEEP DIVE (Prioritized Intelligence)
Elite Politics & Internal Stability: Look for power struggles within religious organizations (e.g., NU/Muhammadiyah), political parties, or civil-military relations. Do not ignore non-kinetic political maneuvering.
Geopolitics & Defense: Analyze shifts in alliances (e.g., Russia/China vs. US).
Crisis Management: How is the state handling disasters? Is there evidence of systemic failure or public dissent?
ECONOMIC STATECRAFT (The Political Economy)
Analyze economic news through a political lens.
Example: Is a tax delay an economic necessity or a tool for political survival?
Look for: Resource nationalism (export bans), infrastructure failures affecting GDP, and patronage networks (corruption cases).
STRATEGIC FORESIGHT & SIGNPOSTS
Likely Trajectory: What happens next based on these signals?
Signposts: What specific future indicators should US policymakers watch for to confirm this assessment? (e.g., "Watch for the resignation of Official X...").
US POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Provide 3 distinct impacts on US interests (Security, Economic, Diplomatic).
Constraint: Do not offer policy advice (what we should do), but rather implications (what will happen to us if this continues).
Constraints:
Filter Sensitivity: Aggressively filter out celebrity news unless it connects to political figures.
Corruption Nexus: Specifically look for links between natural disasters and corruption (e.g., illegal logging) as this is a key driver of instability.
Date Verification: If the transcript mentions "2024" and "2025", assume the latest date is current but flag inconsistencies in the Source Reliability section.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER
TITLE: Indonesia Pivots to Russia/Pakistan Amidst Severe Domestic Disaster Crisis and Elite Fracture within Nahdlatul Ulama
DATE: December 11, 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Strategic Synthesis: The administration of President Prabowo Subianto is aggressively pursuing high-profile foreign policy victories—specifically deepening ties with Russia (nuclear cooperation) and Pakistan (defense/health)—likely to offset a deteriorating domestic stability picture. At home, the state is grappling with a massive humanitarian disaster in Sumatra (claiming nearly 1,000 lives), systemic infrastructure failures, and a significant leadership schism within the country's largest Islamic organization, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU). The central government is deploying performative accountability measures (suspending local regents, arresting corporate loggers) to quell public dissent regarding the disaster response.

Confidence Level: MEDIUM. While the political movements and disaster impacts are well-documented, the casualty figures (969 dead) and the intensity of the Thailand-Cambodia border skirmishes reported require cross-verification through non-media assets.

SOURCE RELIABILITY & NARRATIVE ANALYSIS

THEMATIC DEEP DIVE

1. Elite Politics & Internal Stability (The NU Schism)

2. Geopolitics & Defense (The Russian Pivot)

3. Crisis Management (The Corruption-Disaster Nexus)

ECONOMIC STATECRAFT

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT & SIGNPOSTS

US POLICY IMPLICATIONS

  1. Security (Nuclear Proliferation): The potential entry of Russian state nuclear corporations (Rosatom) into Indonesia presents a significant security risk. It provides Moscow with leverage over Indonesian energy security and complicates US-Indonesia civil nuclear cooperation under the existing 123 Agreement mechanisms.
  2. Diplomatic (ASEAN Stability): The escalated kinetic conflict between Thailand and Cambodia, combined with Indonesia's distraction with domestic disasters and Russian outreach, leaves a leadership void in ASEAN. This weakens the bloc's ability to counter PRC influence in the South China Sea.
  3. Economic (Supply Chain): The tightening of gold export regulations indicates that Indonesia's resource nationalism is expanding beyond nickel. US mining interests and supply chains relying on raw/semi-processed Indonesian minerals face increased regulatory risk and forced domestic processing requirements.

 

Now let's ask Gemini one last time to help improve the prompt – this time by giving it ALL of the prompts and resulting reports above:

Below are a series of reports and the prompts used to make them. Look over all of them, find the best parts and what works particularly well and what doesn't work well and look at all of the prompts and give me a recommended prompt that builds on all of these prompts to make the ultimate prompt to generate the ultimate report.

Here is the ultimate recommended prompt.

Why this is the best version:
It synthesizes the structural strengths of Iteration 6 (the short/medium/long-term foresight and recommendations) with the analytic sophistication of Iteration 7 (elite politics, source reliability, and economic statecraft). Crucially, it fixes the "over-filtering" error from the final attempt by explicitly instructing the model to treat industrial accidents and infrastructure failures as strategic governance indicators, ensuring stories like the drone factory fire are not discarded as "local news."

The Ultimate Prompt

Role & Objective:
You are a Senior Strategic Analyst for the CIA's Open Source Center (OSC). Your task is to process the attached raw broadcast transcripts from a full day of foreign television news. You must distinguish between hard intelligence (verifiable facts), state narratives (propaganda/spin), and political signaling. You are writing for the President of the United States.

Input Handling Instructions:

The Output:
Compose a President’s Daily Brief (PDB). The tone must be objective, skeptical, analytic, and concise. Use "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF) methodology.

Report Structure:

1. INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (The "BLUF")

3. ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)
Do not organize chronologically. Organize by these strategic themes:

4. STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)
Based strictly on the trajectory of today’s intelligence:

5. RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

Constraints:

 

And let's try it:

Role & Objective:
You are a Senior Strategic Analyst for the CIA's Open Source Center (OSC). Your task is to process the attached raw broadcast transcripts from a full day of foreign television news. You must distinguish between hard intelligence (verifiable facts), state narratives (propaganda/spin), and political signaling. You are writing for the President of the United States.
Input Handling Instructions:
Filter Noise: Aggressively ignore commercials, celebrity gossip, and anchor banter.
Strategic Signal Detection: Do not dismiss "local" events if they indicate systemic trends. Treat major industrial accidents, infrastructure collapses, or regional corruption arrests as Strategic Governance Indicators (evidence of state capacity failure).
Elite Politics: Pay close attention to non-kinetic power struggles within major religious organizations, political parties, or civil-military structures.
The Output:
Compose a President’s Daily Brief (PDB). The tone must be objective, skeptical, analytic, and concise. Use "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF) methodology.
Report Structure:
1. INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER
TITLE: A single, impactful sentence capturing the day's strategic gravity.
DATE: [Verify timeline carefully]
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (The "BLUF")
Strategic Synthesis: A 1-2 paragraph narrative that connects the dots. Explain the convergence of events. (e.g., "The administration is leveraging foreign policy wins to distract from domestic crisis...").
Key Developments: A bulleted list of the top 3-5 events of strategic importance.
Confidence & Sourcing: Briefly note if a major story is single-source or if the media outlet is pushing a specific political agenda (narrative analysis).
3. ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)
Do not organize chronologically. Organize by these strategic themes:
Geopolitics & Defense: Alliances, military pivots, foreign visits (e.g., Russia/China vs. Western alignment).
Domestic Stability & Governance: Disaster response, infrastructure failures, industrial safety, and public unrest. Connect these to state capacity.
Elite Politics & Internal Fractures: Leadership struggles within religious groups (e.g., NU/Muhammadiyah), parties, or the cabinet.
Economic Statecraft: Analyze economic news through a political lens (e.g., resource nationalism, export bans, tax policy as populist tools).
4. STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)
Based strictly on the trajectory of today’s intelligence:
Short Term (Tactical | 1-4 Weeks): Immediate fallouts, arrests, reactionary policies, or social unrest.
Medium Term (Operational | 1-6 Months): Regulatory shifts, budget impacts, diplomatic formalizations.
Long Term (Strategic | 1-5 Years): Structural changes to alliances, energy infrastructure, or regime stability.
5. RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS
For US Policy: 3 distinct implications for US interests (Security, Economic, Diplomatic).
For Private Sector/Investors: 2 distinct risks regarding supply chains, regulatory compliance, or safety standards.
Constraints:
Synthesize the entire day into a high-density report (up to 10 pages as needed for depth).
Use your world knowledge to contextualize why an event is unusual or significant (historical baselines).
Highlight any discrepancies between government statements and ground reality.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Jakarta Pursues Nuclear Ties with Moscow Amidst Systemic Domestic Disaster Response Failures
DATE: 10 December 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Synthesis:
The Prabowo Subianto administration is bifurcated between high-level diplomatic maneuvering abroad and a collapsing state capacity situation at home. While President Prabowo actively pivots toward the Global South and East—securing nuclear energy offers from Vladimir Putin in Moscow and strategic partnerships in Pakistan—Indonesia is grappling with a catastrophic breakdown in domestic disaster management. The devastating floods in Sumatra (death toll approaching 1,000) and a fatal industrial fire in Jakarta have exposed severe regulatory negligence, infrastructure fragility, and a disconnect between central government narratives and ground realities. The administration is likely leveraging foreign policy successes to maintain legitimacy while delegated officials struggle to contain cascading governance failures.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing:
Assessment is based on high-volume broadcast data from Metro TV (10 Dec 2025). Reporting on the disaster toll and the PBNU split is multi-sourced and credible. Information regarding the Russia meetings aligns with Kremlin narratives but requires verification regarding the depth of signed commitments.

3. ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: The Eastern Pivot

Domestic Stability & Governance: Indicators of State Failure

Elite Politics: The Battle for Nahdlatul Ulama (PBNU)

Economic Statecraft: Resource Nationalism & Corruption

4. STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

5. RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

For Private Sector/Investors:

 

Let's apply that same prompt to the full day of Russia Today's coverage for the same day of December 10, 2025, which cost $0.954312 (due to the larger input volume since the transcript was longer). As with the report above, the model's ability to assess the  confidence of the source material is skewed by the model's outdated source knowledge and the deviation of current events from past norms. For example, Gemini asserts that "Confidence in the characterization of U.S. policy documents (specifically the labeling of the EU as "anti-democratic") is Low to Moderate, heavily suspecting Russian disinformation or exaggeration intended to fracture NATO/EU cohesion", which makes sense based on traditional US official views towards Europe but actually is an accurate portrayal of the administration's revised stance towards the EU.

Role & Objective:
You are a Senior Strategic Analyst for the CIA's Open Source Center (OSC). Your task is to process the attached raw broadcast transcripts from a full day of foreign television news. You must distinguish between hard intelligence (verifiable facts), state narratives (propaganda/spin), and political signaling. You are writing for the President of the United States.
Input Handling Instructions:
Filter Noise: Aggressively ignore commercials, celebrity gossip, and anchor banter.
Strategic Signal Detection: Do not dismiss "local" events if they indicate systemic trends. Treat major industrial accidents, infrastructure collapses, or regional corruption arrests as Strategic Governance Indicators (evidence of state capacity failure).
Elite Politics: Pay close attention to non-kinetic power struggles within major religious organizations, political parties, or civil-military structures.
The Output:
Compose a President’s Daily Brief (PDB). The tone must be objective, skeptical, analytic, and concise. Use "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF) methodology.
Report Structure:
INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER
TITLE: A single, impactful sentence capturing the day's strategic gravity.
DATE: [Verify timeline carefully]
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (The "BLUF")
Strategic Synthesis: A 1-2 paragraph narrative that connects the dots. Explain the convergence of events. (e.g., "The administration is leveraging foreign policy wins to distract from domestic crisis...").
Key Developments: A bulleted list of the top 3-5 events of strategic importance.
Confidence & Sourcing: Briefly note if a major story is single-source or if the media outlet is pushing a specific political agenda (narrative analysis).
ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)
Do not organize chronologically. Organize by these strategic themes:
Geopolitics & Defense: Alliances, military pivots, foreign visits (e.g., Russia/China vs. Western alignment).
Domestic Stability & Governance: Disaster response, infrastructure failures, industrial safety, and public unrest. Connect these to state capacity.
Elite Politics & Internal Fractures: Leadership struggles within religious groups (e.g., NU/Muhammadiyah), parties, or the cabinet.
Economic Statecraft: Analyze economic news through a political lens (e.g., resource nationalism, export bans, tax policy as populist tools).
STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)
Based strictly on the trajectory of today’s intelligence:
Short Term (Tactical | 1-4 Weeks): Immediate fallouts, arrests, reactionary policies, or social unrest.
Medium Term (Operational | 1-6 Months): Regulatory shifts, budget impacts, diplomatic formalizations.
Long Term (Strategic | 1-5 Years): Structural changes to alliances, energy infrastructure, or regime stability.
RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS
For US Policy: 3 distinct implications for US interests (Security, Economic, Diplomatic).
For Private Sector/Investors: 2 distinct risks regarding supply chains, regulatory compliance, or safety standards.
Constraints:
Synthesize the entire day into a high-density report (up to 10 pages as needed for depth).
Use your world knowledge to contextualize why an event is unusual or significant (historical baselines).
Highlight any discrepancies between government statements and ground reality.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Russia Exploits Transatlantic Fissures; Solidifies Indian Strategic Pivot Amidst US Tariff Pressure
DATE: December 6, 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Synthesis:
The Russian Federation is aggressively capitalizing on perceived incoherence in U.S. foreign policy to cement a "privileged strategic partnership" with India. President Vladimir Putin’s high-profile state visit to New Delhi, coinciding with the launch of RT India, is designed to project that Moscow is not isolated but is instead the architect of a new Eurasian security and economic architecture. State media is heavily leveraging narratives regarding the Trump Administration’s imposition of 50% tariffs on Indian exports and a purported new U.S. National Security Strategy that allegedly labels the European Union as an adversary. Moscow is framing itself as New Delhi’s "all-weather friend" in contrast to a volatile Washington, aiming to insulate the Indian economy from Western sanctions via de-dollarized trade mechanisms.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing:
Assessment is based on Russian state media (RT) broadcasts. Confidence in the occurrence of the summit and signed agreements is High. Confidence in the characterization of U.S. policy documents (specifically the labeling of the EU as "anti-democratic") is Low to Moderate, heavily suspecting Russian disinformation or exaggeration intended to fracture NATO/EU cohesion.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: The Eurasia Pivot & NATO Fractures

Domestic Stability & Governance: State Capacity Failures

Elite Politics & Internal Fractures

Economic Statecraft: Weaponization of Trade

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

Short Term (Tactical | 1-4 Weeks):

Medium Term (Operational | 1-6 Months):

Long Term (Strategic | 1-5 Years):

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

For Private Sector/Investors:

 

Let's use the same prompt, but apply it to the combined full day transcripts of IRINN and PressTV using Gemini 3 Pro to get a two-channel overview of Iran that combines its foreign and domestic coverage, which cost $1.563168:

Role & Objective:
You are a Senior Strategic Analyst for the CIA's Open Source Center (OSC). Your task is to process the attached raw broadcast transcripts from a full day of foreign television news. You must distinguish between hard intelligence (verifiable facts), state narratives (propaganda/spin), and political signaling. You are writing for the President of the United States.
Input Handling Instructions:
Filter Noise: Aggressively ignore commercials, celebrity gossip, and anchor banter.
Strategic Signal Detection: Do not dismiss "local" events if they indicate systemic trends. Treat major industrial accidents, infrastructure collapses, or regional corruption arrests as Strategic Governance Indicators (evidence of state capacity failure).
Elite Politics: Pay close attention to non-kinetic power struggles within major religious organizations, political parties, or civil-military structures.
The Output:
Compose a President’s Daily Brief (PDB). The tone must be objective, skeptical, analytic, and concise. Use "Bottom Line Up Front" (BLUF) methodology.
Report Structure:
INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER
TITLE: A single, impactful sentence capturing the day's strategic gravity.
DATE: [Verify timeline carefully]
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (The "BLUF")
Strategic Synthesis: A 1-2 paragraph narrative that connects the dots. Explain the convergence of events. (e.g., "The administration is leveraging foreign policy wins to distract from domestic crisis...").
Key Developments: A bulleted list of the top 3-5 events of strategic importance.
Confidence & Sourcing: Briefly note if a major story is single-source or if the media outlet is pushing a specific political agenda (narrative analysis).
ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)
Do not organize chronologically. Organize by these strategic themes:
Geopolitics & Defense: Alliances, military pivots, foreign visits (e.g., Russia/China vs. Western alignment).
Domestic Stability & Governance: Disaster response, infrastructure failures, industrial safety, and public unrest. Connect these to state capacity.
Elite Politics & Internal Fractures: Leadership struggles within religious groups (e.g., NU/Muhammadiyah), parties, or the cabinet.
Economic Statecraft: Analyze economic news through a political lens (e.g., resource nationalism, export bans, tax policy as populist tools).
STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)
Based strictly on the trajectory of today’s intelligence:
Short Term (Tactical | 1-4 Weeks): Immediate fallouts, arrests, reactionary policies, or social unrest.
Medium Term (Operational | 1-6 Months): Regulatory shifts, budget impacts, diplomatic formalizations.
Long Term (Strategic | 1-5 Years): Structural changes to alliances, energy infrastructure, or regime stability.
RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS
For US Policy: 3 distinct implications for US interests (Security, Economic, Diplomatic).
For Private Sector/Investors: 2 distinct risks regarding supply chains, regulatory compliance, or safety standards.
Constraints:
Synthesize the entire day into a high-density report (up to 10 pages as needed for depth).
Use your world knowledge to contextualize why an event is unusual or significant (historical baselines).
Highlight any discrepancies between government statements and ground reality.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Tehran Pivots to Central Asia Amidst Post-Conflict Regional Realignment; Narrative Warfare Intensifies Regarding "12-Day War" Results.
DATE: December 10, 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Synthesis:
The Iranian administration, under President Masoud Pezeshkian, is executing a dual-track strategy following the recent cessation of hostilities with Israel (referred to domestically as the "12-Day War"). Domestically, the regime is engaged in a massive propaganda campaign to frame the conflict as a strategic victory, claiming ballistic missile penetration of Israeli air defenses to bolster nationalist sentiment. Regionally, Tehran is accelerating diplomatic and economic integration with Central Asia (Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan) to offset renewed pressure from the Trump administration. The geopolitical landscape in the Levant has shifted fundamentally, with Iranian state media acknowledging the fall of the Assad regime in Syria one year prior, forcing the IRGC to recalibrate its "Axis of Resistance" amidst a hostile environment in Damascus under Al-Julani.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing:
Assessment based on high-confidence translation of Iranian state broadcasting (Press TV, IRINN). Note: All battlefield damage assessments regarding Israel and economic data regarding the US reflect Iranian state propaganda and require independent verification.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: The Post-War Landscape

Economic Statecraft: Eurasian Integration & Resource Nationalism

Domestic Stability & Governance: Weather & Welfare

Elite Politics: The Pezeshkian Doctrine

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

Short Term (1-4 Weeks):

Medium Term (1-6 Months):

Long Term (1-5 Years):

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

For Private Sector/Investors:

 

Let's repeat that same prompt, but with Gemini 2.5 Pro to see if all of the added structuring and guidance of the new prompt dramatically improves 2.5 Pro's ability to truly synthesize and distill high-order narrative structure. This cost $1.009413 – about $0.50 cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro. This time all of the added structuring yields a result far more similar to Gemini 3 Pro than we have previously been able to achieve with the 2.5 Pro model, though the results are still far more literal than 3 Pro's much richer abstractions and clustering.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Iran Projects Regional Leadership Amidst Israeli Disarray and Domestic Economic Strain

DATE: 10 December 2025

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (BLUF)

Strategic Synthesis:
Tehran is executing a confident, dual-track strategy: projecting regional leadership abroad while managing significant domestic pressures. President Pezeshkian's diplomatic tour of Central Asia aims to solidify sanction-resistant economic corridors through frameworks like the SCO and BRICS, explicitly countering the US narrative of Iranian isolation. Concurrently, Iranian state media is aggressively pushing a narrative of Western decline, focusing heavily on Israel's repeated and blatant Gaza ceasefire violations, deepening internal political fractures within the Netanyahu government, and the US cost-of-living crisis. This external messaging contrasts with internal reporting that acknowledges severe domestic challenges, most notably a critical water crisis threatening national stability and ongoing struggles with fuel subsidy reforms.

Militarily, Iran continues to signal deterrence and technological advancement with the unveiling of a new electronic warfare system, reinforcing its doctrine of self-reliance. The convergence of these events indicates a regime that is skillfully leveraging perceived foreign policy successes and adversary weaknesses to bolster its position, even as it grapples with systemic environmental and economic vulnerabilities at home that could threaten long-term stability.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing: This assessment is based on a full-day analysis of Iran's primary state-controlled broadcasters (Press TV, IRINN). While the factual basis of international events (e.g., protests in Oslo, a ceasefire violation) is generally reliable, the framing, emphasis, and omission of context constitute a deliberate state narrative designed to portray Iran and its allies favorably while highlighting the failures and moral corruption of the US and its partners. Reporting on domestic failures like the water crisis, while factual, is carefully managed.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: The Multi-Polar Pivot in Action

Tehran's foreign policy is actively focused on building a durable, non-Western-aligned bloc.

Domestic Stability & Governance: Cracks in the Foundation

Beneath the confident foreign policy posture, OSINT reveals significant domestic vulnerabilities that represent a long-term threat to regime stability.

Elite Politics & Internal Fractures

Economic Statecraft

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

  1. Security Implication: Iran is signaling increased confidence in its asymmetric and conventional deterrence, from EW and cyber to missile capabilities. The internal political instability in Israel may lead to more erratic and unpredictable decision-making from Tel Aviv, increasing regional miscalculation risks. US contingency planning should account for a less stable Israeli partner.
  2. Economic Implication: The North-South Transport Corridor, once fully operational via the Chabahar rail link, will offer Russia, India, and Central Asian states a viable alternative to Suez, directly undermining the impact of US maritime sanctions policy. US strategy must evolve to address the reality of these emerging, sanction-resistant economic blocs.
  3. Diplomatic Implication: Tehran is successfully framing the Gaza crisis as a catastrophic failure of US diplomacy and a marker of its declining influence. The US must prepare for increased diplomatic challenges from a more coordinated Global South bloc (within the UN and other forums) that views US policy in the region as biased and ineffective.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Supply Chain Risk: The ongoing, low-level conflict in Gaza and the potential for escalation on the Lebanon-Israel border pose a direct threat to Eastern Mediterranean shipping lanes and regional logistics. Companies relying on suppliers or transit through this region should activate contingency plans.
  2. Regulatory & Reputational Risk: The growing global success of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, as exemplified by the Lipton-Turkey case, presents a tangible risk for Western brands. Companies with perceived ties to Israel's military or settlement economy face increasing consumer backlash and reputational damage, particularly in markets across the Muslim world and Europe.

 

Let's look across all 6 Russian news channels currently monitored in a single pass. Unfortunately, despite consuming just 864,583 tokens, both Gemini 3 Pro and Flash exceed their maximum token limits in both Low and High Thinking levels, so it is at this time impossible to perform a full-day all-channels analysis of Russian television news using Gemini 3. In contrast, Gemini 2.5 Pro does not have any issue at all doing so (it consumes 870,935 tokens after thinking and output) and produced the following report distilling the combined coverage of all six channels for December 10th for a cost of $2.219615.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Trump Administration Pressures Kyiv for Christmas Peace Deal, Sidelining Fractured European Allies.
DATE: December 10, 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Bottom Line Up Front)

Strategic Synthesis:
The Trump administration is aggressively accelerating a diplomatic track to force a Ukraine peace settlement by Christmas, creating a significant transatlantic rift that Moscow is skillfully exploiting. The administration's direct engagement with Moscow, coupled with President Trump’s public broadsides against European leaders and Ukrainian President Zelensky, indicates a deliberate strategy to bypass traditional alliances and dictate terms. This pressure campaign is unfolding as Russian forces consolidate major tactical gains on the battlefield, particularly around Siversk and the Mirnohrad-Pokrovsk agglomeration, reinforcing Washington’s narrative of Ukrainian military unsustainability.

In response, key European powers (UK, France, Germany) are attempting to formulate a counter-proposal, signaling a deepening divide with Washington over the conflict's endgame. Moscow is capitalizing on this schism, publicly lauding Trump's "realism" while castigating European "destructiveness." Concurrently, Russia is cementing its strategic pivot to the Global South, highlighted by President Putin’s high-level summit with the President of Indonesia, a new BRICS partner. Domestically, the Kyiv regime is showing signs of severe internal stress, with oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky’s public allegations of an assassination attempt on a key Zelensky associate pointing to a dangerous power struggle erupting from within.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing: High confidence. Russian state-controlled media (1TV, Zvezda, NTV, Russia-1/24) presents a unified narrative, consistently amplifying reports from Western outlets (e.g., Financial Times, Politico, Washington Post) that validate its core message: US pragmatism is clashing with European belligerence, and Ukraine's position is collapsing both militarily and politically. The uniformity of this messaging across state channels indicates a centrally directed information campaign. The Kolomoisky affair is being treated as a major event, confirming its strategic significance.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)

1. Geopolitics & Defense

2. Domestic Stability & Governance

3. Economic Statecraft

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

  1. Security Implication: Russia is successfully exploiting the divide between the US and its European allies over Ukraine strategy. This risks a permanent weakening of NATO's political cohesion and could embolden Moscow to challenge Alliance unity on other fronts.
  2. Economic Implication: The EU’s potential seizure of Russian sovereign assets creates a grave systemic risk for the global financial system. Such an action would validate Moscow's de-dollarization narrative, accelerate the move by non-Western states toward alternative reserve currencies, and could have long-term negative consequences for the primacy of the U.S. Dollar.
  3. Diplomatic Implication: The administration's current approach asserts US primacy in negotiating with Russia but comes at the cost of alienating key European allies. This could damage trust and complicate future multilateral diplomatic efforts on issues beyond Ukraine, such as China policy or arms control.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Supply Chain Risk: Growing trade friction between the US and the EU, foreshadowed by President Trump's rhetoric and potential for retaliatory tariffs, poses a significant risk to transatlantic supply chains, particularly in the automotive, aerospace, and technology sectors.
  2. Compliance & Political Risk (Ukraine): The escalating internal power struggles and endemic corruption within the Ukrainian government, exemplified by the Kolomoisky affair, signal extreme political and legal risk. Any firm considering participation in post-conflict reconstruction must anticipate a highly unstable operating environment where contracts and assets could be subject to seizure or political retribution.

 

Since Gemini 3 Pro was unable to examine all channels at once, let's review each of the six individually. We've already examined Russia Today earlier, so let's look at Russia 24, costing $0.832088.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Kremlin Leverages Perceived US-EU Rift to Accelerate Gains in Ukraine; Deepens Strategic Pivot to Southeast Asia
DATE: 10 December 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Synthesis:
The Kremlin is currently executing a coordinated information and military offensive designed to capitalize on perceived fractures within the NATO alliance following the shift in US administration. State media is heavily amplifying rhetoric attributed to President Trump regarding European weakness and potential NATO withdrawal to demoralize Kyiv and portray Russian victory as inevitable. Concurrently, Moscow is aggressively consolidating ties with non-Western powers, specifically utilizing defense and energy diplomacy with Indonesia, Vietnam, and Laos to demonstrate immunity to isolation. Domestically, the regime is conducting high-profile anti-corruption purges against regional officials, signaling that state capacity and resource discipline are paramount as the war economy solidifies.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing:
High confidence in the reporting of diplomatic visits and domestic arrests. Moderate confidence in specific battlefield claims (Seversk), as state media aggressively pushes a "collapse" narrative that requires cross-verification with imagery intelligence.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: Exploiting the West, Pivoting East

Domestic Stability & Governance: Disciplining the Vertical

Elite Politics & Internal Fractures

Information Operations: Cultural Warfare

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

Short Term (1-4 Weeks):

Medium Term (1-6 Months):

Long Term (1-5 Years):

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

For Private Sector/Investors:

 

And the same analysis from Gemini 2.5 Pro costing $0.556625. Note that this focuses almost exclusively on the domestic narratives and lacks the second pillar of international partnerships that Gemini 3 Pro brought to the forefront.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Moscow Projects Total Strategic Confidence, Weaponizing US Political Discourse to Fracture Transatlantic Alliances.

DATE: 10 December 2025

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (BLUF)

Strategic Synthesis: The Kremlin is executing a coordinated, high-tempo information campaign projecting an image of a technologically sovereign, militarily ascendant, and morally vindicated nation. This narrative is constructed around two central pillars: the ceremonial glorification of the "Special Military Operation" (SMO) as a continuation of Russia's historical military greatness, and the meticulous, almost obsessive, use of statements by former President Trump to validate Russia’s core strategic objectives. Moscow portrays the conflict not as a war against Ukraine, but as a successful campaign to expose the illegitimacy of the Kyiv government, the strategic bankruptcy of NATO, and the terminal decline of a subservient Europe.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing: High confidence assessment. The analysis is based on a full broadcast day from Russia-24, a primary state-controlled media outlet. The content does not reflect a spectrum of opinion but rather the Kremlin's explicitly curated and desired national narrative. The uniformity of messaging across different segments indicates a centrally directed information strategy.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)

1. Geopolitics & Defense: The "Two-Sovereign" Worldview

The dominant geopolitical narrative of the day posits a world where only two truly sovereign actors can determine Europe's fate: Russia and the United States (specifically, a Trump-led America).

2. Domestic Stability & Governance: Projecting State Capacity

The Kremlin is actively countering any notion of internal weakness or technological backwardness by spotlighting state-directed innovation and a crackdown on internal disorder.

3. Elite Politics & Internal Fractures

The broadcast transcript reveals a tightly controlled information environment with no overt signs of elite dissent. The narrative is one of complete national unity behind Putin and the SMO. The Kulibaba case is the only event that hints at internal power dynamics, but it is carefully framed as a law-and-order issue rather than a political one. The absence of alternative viewpoints is itself a key indicator of the regime's control over the information space.

4. Economic Statecraft: The Sanctions War as Moral Contest

Economic news is filtered through a geopolitical lens, portraying Russia as a resilient economy under unjust attack by a lawless West.

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

  1. Security Implication: The Kremlin is adept at weaponizing statements from the US political ecosystem to undermine alliances. The US must develop a proactive counter-messaging strategy aimed at NATO allies, inoculating them against Russian narratives that exploit internal US political debates.
  2. Economic Implication: The Russian narrative of Western "theft" of sovereign assets is gaining traction with non-aligned states. The US Treasury and State Department should prepare for pointed questions from Global South partners regarding the security of their assets within the Western financial system and articulate a clear, law-based justification for any action taken against Russian reserves.
  3. Diplomatic Implication: Russia is actively promoting a "condominium" model for European security, where Washington and Moscow dictate terms over the heads of European leaders. US diplomacy must vigorously and publicly reaffirm European agency and the principle of collective security to counter this delegitimizing narrative.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Regulatory & Compliance Risk: The high-profile arrest of a figure like Kulibaba, tied to both the political establishment (Olympics) and organized crime, underscores the extreme opacity and risk of the Russian business environment. Any foreign entity operating in Russia faces a high latent risk of its assets or personnel becoming entangled in internal power struggles disguised as criminal investigations.
  2. Supply Chain Risk: The state's explicit focus on achieving technological sovereignty in critical sectors (drones, navigation, electronics) indicates a permanent and accelerating drive to design Western components out of Russian supply chains. Companies in these sectors should anticipate increased Russian efforts at intellectual property theft and reverse-engineering.

 

How about Russia 1? With Gemini 3 Pro this cost $0.309686:

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: MOSCOW AMPLIFIES "TRUMP PEACE DEADLINE" NARRATIVE AMIDST OFFENSIVE SURGE; INDONESIA PIVOT SIGNALED
DATE: December 10, 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Synthesis:
Russian state media is executing a coordinated information operation designed to delegitimize the Zelensky administration ahead of a purported December 25, 2025, negotiation deadline attributed to President Donald Trump. The prevailing narrative suggests Washington has lost patience with Kyiv, positioning a potential peace deal or capitulation as inevitable by Catholic Christmas. This messaging coincides with intensified kinetic operations in the Donbas (Pokrovsk/Dimitrov axis) to maximize territorial leverage before any potential ceasefire talks. Simultaneously, Moscow is strengthening ties with the Global South, evidenced by high-level nuclear and defense talks with Indonesia, creating a diplomatic hedge against Western isolation. Domestically, the Kremlin is managing rising nativist sentiment through publicized migrant raids while attempting to project competence in the face of severe winter infrastructure strains.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing:
High confidence in the assessment of Russian narrative intent based on synchronized reporting across Russia 1 news blocks. Moderate to Low confidence in specific battlefield control claims (e.g., full encirclement of Dimitrov) and the veracity of the "Mindich assassination attempt" in Israel, which appears to be part of a disinformation campaign to sow chaos in Kyiv's elite circles.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: The Trump Factor and the Asian Pivot

Domestic Stability & Governance: Managing Strain

Elite Politics & Internal Fractures: The Kyiv File

Economic Statecraft: Technocratic Autarky

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

Short Term (Tactical | 1-4 Weeks):

Medium Term (Operational | 1-6 Months):

Long Term (Strategic | 1-5 Years):

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

For Private Sector/Investors:

 

This time Gemini 2.5 Pro's report is more similar to Gemini 3 Pro's, but still lacks some of the international detail, becoming too fixated on domestic affairs. It cost $0.236961.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF: FOR THE PRESIDENT'S EYES ONLY

TITLE: Moscow Signals Diplomatic Openness Amid Domestic Strains and Battlefield Gains

DATE: 10 December 2025

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Bottom Line Up Front)

The Kremlin is broadcasting a dual message. On one hand, it is heavily amplifying reports of a U.S.-led peace initiative, portraying Kyiv as intransigent and itself as open to a diplomatic settlement on its own terms. This external messaging coincides with a significant internal focus on shoring up domestic support for the war by publicly addressing grievances of soldiers' families and repatriates. On the other hand, military reports project confidence with claims of tactical encirclements and attritional victories. This suggests a strategy of negotiating from a perceived position of strength while simultaneously managing the long-term societal costs of the conflict.

Key Developments:

  1. "Peace Plan" Signaling: State media extensively covers a purported Trump-led peace initiative, highlighting Kyiv's reluctance and President Zelensky's reported concessions on NATO and Crimea as evidence of Western pressure and Kyiv's weakening position.
  2. Putin's Domestic Focus: President Putin's meeting with the Human Rights Council centered on resolving social problems arising from the "Special Military Operation" (SVO), including illegal housing evictions of soldiers' families, streamlining school access for repatriates, and regulating migrant labor.
  3. Battlefield Claims: The Ministry of Defense claims tactical encirclements ("cauldrons") of Ukrainian forces near Andreeva and in the city of Usum, alongside the capture of Ostapovskaya in the Zaporozhye region, projecting an image of steady progress.
  4. Governance & Infrastructure Strain: Widespread weather-related disruptions in Siberia and the Far East are impacting transportation and emergency services, highlighting infrastructure vulnerabilities. Concurrently, reports of consumer fraud and debates over weakening product standards point to growing economic pressures.

(Confidence & Sourcing Note: The narrative around the U.S. peace plan is heavily reliant on Russian interpretations of Western media and is being amplified to shape domestic and international perceptions. Battlefield claims are exclusively from the Russian Ministry of Defense and should be treated with extreme skepticism. Putin's domestic policy directives are high-confidence intelligence.)

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: Negotiating from Strength Narrative

Today's broadcasts were dominated by a strategic communication campaign centered on a purported U.S. peace plan. This is not passive news reporting but a concerted effort to:

  1. Frame Russia as amenable to peace, shifting the onus for continued conflict onto Kyiv and its European backers. This is reinforced by UN Representative Nebenzya's statement that "Europe does not need a settlement."
  2. Exploit perceived fractures between the U.S. and Europe. Zelensky's reported need to consult European leaders is framed as a delay tactic against a decisive U.S. initiative.
  3. Declare a strategic victory. Zelensky's reported concessions—that Ukraine is not expected in NATO and cannot retake Crimea—are presented as an admission of defeat and a validation of Russia's core strategic objectives.

Militarily, reports of "cauldrons" and high Ukrainian attrition rates are classic Russian information warfare tactics aimed at demoralizing Ukrainian forces and projecting inevitable victory to a domestic audience. The focus on institutionalizing drone warfare training at universities (e.g., Maykop Technological University) indicates a long-term adaptation of military doctrine based on battlefield experience.

Externally, the high-level meeting with the President of Indonesia demonstrates Moscow's continued diplomatic efforts to build partnerships outside the West, focusing on strategic sectors such as nuclear energy, technology, and military-technical cooperation.

Domestic Stability & Governance: "Manual Control" of War-Related Fallout

Putin's televised meeting with the Human Rights Council was a masterclass in curated political theater, demonstrating a "manual control" (ручное управление) approach to governance. His direct intervention on several sensitive social issues signals that the state bureaucracy is failing to manage the consequences of a prolonged war, requiring presidential action to preempt public discontent.

Elite Politics & Internal Fractures

The Human Rights Council meeting serves as Putin's primary platform for demonstrating responsiveness to societal problems. The structure of the event—allowing members to raise issues for the President to decisively solve—reinforces his image as the ultimate arbiter and problem-solver, standing above a flawed bureaucracy. The public dressing-down of unnamed officials over soldier evictions is a warning to the entire state apparatus: failures related to the war effort will not be tolerated. The brief debate on university quotas, while minor, is a rare glimpse of managed dissent on a sensitive topic, allowing the regime to acknowledge a problem before dismissing it, thereby controlling the narrative.

Economic Statecraft: Sovereignty at All Costs

Putin's meeting with the Academy of Sciences, coupled with reassurances of increased, non-sequestered funding, underscores the Kremlin's long-term strategy of achieving technological sovereignty in response to Western sanctions. National projects in "space and bio-economy" are identified as key priorities. This reflects a state-directed effort to reorient the economy towards self-sufficiency in critical high-tech sectors. The parallel discussion of a St. Petersburg forum on Arctic development indicates that resource extraction and control over the Northern Sea Route remain core economic imperatives. Meanwhile, on a micro-level, the public debate over potentially lowering GOST (state quality standards) for products like chocolate indicates pressure on manufacturers and a potential willingness by the state to sacrifice consumer protection for economic stability.

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

Short Term (Tactical | 1-4 Weeks):

Medium Term (Operational | 1-6 Months):

Long Term (Strategic | 1-5 Years):

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For U.S. Policy:

  1. Security Implication: Russia is signaling a willingness to negotiate, but only from a position of perceived strength and on terms that ratify its territorial gains. Any U.S.-led peace initiative will be instrumentalized by Moscow for information operations designed to divide the Western alliance and demoralize Ukraine.
  2. Diplomatic Implication: Putin is actively managing the domestic social contract to ensure the long-term sustainability of his war effort. U.S. public diplomacy should highlight the internal costs and societal trade-offs (e.g., meritocracy vs. loyalty-based benefits, crumbling regional infrastructure vs. military spending) being forced upon the Russian population.
  3. Economic Implication: Moscow's engagement with nations like Indonesia in strategic sectors (nuclear energy, military hardware) is a clear attempt to build a non-Western economic and technological bloc. The U.S. should monitor these efforts and offer credible alternatives to key partners in the Global South.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Regulatory Risk: The Kremlin's "manual control" governance style creates a highly unpredictable regulatory environment. Politically motivated crackdowns (e.g., on migrant labor) or sudden shifts in industrial standards (e.g., GOST) can disrupt business operations, supply chains, and labor availability with little to no warning.
  2. Infrastructure Risk: Overwhelming evidence of strained and failing infrastructure, particularly in Siberian and Far Eastern transport networks, indicates heightened physical risk to supply chains. Businesses reliant on Russian logistics face a growing probability of significant delays and disruptions, especially during winter months.

 

And 1TV with Gemini 3 Pro? Cost was $0.231610.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Kremlin Amplifies Narrative of Western Fracture; Pivots to Indonesia Amidst Domestic Infrastructure Strain
DATE: December 10, 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Synthesis:
The Russian state media apparatus is currently executing a synchronized information operation designed to portray the United States, under the Trump administration, as decisively decoupling from European security commitments and Ukraine. Moscow is leveraging reports of a US-imposed "Christmas deadline" for peace talks to demoralize Kyiv and fracture European unity. Simultaneously, the Kremlin is projecting global connectivity through a high-profile visit by Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, aiming to secure long-term energy and military-technical cooperation with a key Global South player. Domestically, the regime is managing rising social discontent regarding crumbling utility infrastructure by channeling grievances toward the upcoming "Direct Line" with President Putin, reinforcing his role as the sole guarantor of stability while acknowledging severe labor shortages in the defense sector.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing:
High confidence in the thematic analysis of Russian state messaging (Source: Channel One Russia). Moderate to High confidence in reported frontline advances (Ostapovskoye), as specific village captures are rarely claimed by state media unless physically secured to avoid embarrassment. Low confidence in specific allegations regarding the Ukrainian leadership (e.g., child trafficking rings), which bear hallmarks of fabricated kompromat.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense

Domestic Stability & Governance

Elite Politics & Internal Fractures

Economic Statecraft

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

  1. Counter-Narrative: The State Department must aggressively counter the narrative that the US is abandoning Europe/NATO to prevent demoralization in Kyiv and Brussels.
  2. Indonesia Engagement: The US must offer competitive alternatives to Rosatom for Indonesia’s energy needs to prevent Moscow from establishing a strategic nuclear foothold in the Indo-Pacific.
  3. Sanctions Enforcement: Focus enforcement on the supply chains enabling the production of Su-34s and drone technology, as Russia touts these as decisive factors in the current offensive.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Supply Chain Risk: Companies with exposure to Southeast Asia (specifically Indonesia) should monitor for secondary sanctions risks as Jakarta deepens ties with the Russian military-industrial complex.
  2. Operational Risk (Russia): The acknowledged labor shortage in Russia’s industrial sector and crumbling municipal infrastructure increases the risk of industrial accidents and logistical failures for any remaining Western assets or supply chains transiting the region.

 

And Gemini 2.5 Pro cost $0.189726.

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Russia Intensifies Military and Diplomatic Pressure, Projects Confidence in a Post-Western Order

DATE: 10 December 2025

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Bottom Line Up Front)

Strategic Synthesis: The Kremlin is executing a synchronized military and information campaign to force a conclusion to the Ukraine conflict on its terms. State media is saturated with a narrative portraying the United States under President Trump as forcing a peace settlement on an isolated, illegitimate Kyiv and a decaying, subordinate Europe. This diplomatic pressure is backstopped by claims of significant battlefield gains, designed to signal the futility of further Ukrainian resistance. Domestically, the regime is actively managing public perception of a protracted war through sophisticated political stagecraft, centered on President Putin’s upcoming “Results of the Year” town hall, which is being framed as a demonstration of a highly responsive and effective government. Concurrently, high-profile engagements, such as the Moscow visit of Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, are being leveraged to showcase the success of Russia's strategic pivot to the Global South and the viability of a BRICS-centric world order independent of Western institutions.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing: This assessment is based on a full-day broadcast from Russia’s Channel One (1TV), a primary organ of state propaganda. Confidence is HIGH in the existence and intent of the strategic narratives presented. Confidence is LOW regarding the veracity of specific battlefield claims, which must be treated as part of a coordinated information operation. Reporting on the US peace initiative cites Western media (Financial Times) but is selectively framed to fit the Kremlin's preferred narrative of Western disunity.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)

1. Geopolitics & Defense: The "Force and Diplomacy" Two-Step

The Kremlin's current strategy is a classic demonstration of leveraging military gains to create favorable diplomatic conditions.

2. Domestic Stability & Governance: Manufacturing Consent for a Long War

The Kremlin is demonstrating acute awareness of the need to maintain domestic stability during a protracted conflict. The "Itogi Goda s Vladimirom Putinym" (Results of the Year with Vladimir Putin) event is the centerpiece of this effort.

3. Elite Politics & Internal Fractures: Information Warfare Targets

While the broadcast offers no direct insight into fractures within the Russian elite, it reveals a concerted information campaign to highlight and exacerbate perceived divisions within Ukraine and the West.

4. Economic Statecraft: Sanctions as Theft, BRICS as the Future

Russia frames Western economic policy as illegitimate and its own as resilient and forward-looking.

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

  1. Security Implication: Russia is projecting high confidence in its military's resilience and the output of its wartime industrial base. US and NATO intelligence assessments must be recalibrated to account for Russia's demonstrated capacity to sustain a high-intensity conflict longer than previously anticipated.
  2. Diplomatic Implication: The Kremlin is skillfully weaponizing the "Trump peace plan" narrative to drive a wedge between the United States and its European allies, and to isolate Ukraine. A clear, unified, and consistent transatlantic diplomatic strategy is essential to counter this and prevent Moscow from dictating the terms of any future settlement.
  3. Economic Implication: Russia's strategic pivot to major Global South economies like Indonesia is accelerating the fragmentation of the global economy. US economic statecraft must adapt to a world with increasingly viable non-Western trade corridors, financial systems, and supply chains.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Regulatory & Financial Risk: The debate over seizing Russian sovereign assets is reaching a critical point. Any move by the EU to do so will almost certainly trigger symmetrical Russian retaliation against Western corporate assets still within its jurisdiction. Companies with any remaining exposure in Russia face a high risk of total loss.
  2. Geopolitical Supply Chain Risk: The deepening Russia-Indonesia strategic partnership, particularly in defense and nuclear sectors, signals shifting alignments in Southeast Asia. US and European companies operating in these high-tech sectors should anticipate potential new sanctions regimes and increased compliance complexities related to dual-use technologies in the region.

 

Examining ZVEZDA with Gemini 3 Pro cost $0.217522:

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Russia Accelerates Diplomatic Pivot to Southeast Asia; Intensifies Tactical Use of Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) in Donbas Offensive.
DATE: 10 December 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT
SOURCE: Russian Ministry of Defense Media (Zvezda)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Synthesis:
The Kremlin is leveraging high-level security visits to Southeast Asia to counter Western containment strategies, specifically framing US alliances in the Indo-Pacific as "NATO embryos." Concurrently, Russian state media is conducting a coordinated information operation designed to delegitimize the Ukrainian government and Western defense procurement. This narrative portrays the Ukrainian leadership as obstructing a Trump-led peace initiative to preserve personal power, while simultaneously highlighting Russian tactical gains in the Donbas to demonstrate inevitability of victory. The Russian military is showcasing a significant evolution in robotic warfare, moving beyond aerial drones to the systemic integration of ground-based robotic platforms for logistics and assault.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing:

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: The Asia Pivot and "Atlantic Bastion" Anxiety

Domestic Stability & Governance: State Capacity Stress Tests

Elite Politics & Information Warfare: Delegitimization Campaigns

Tactical Evolution: The Rise of the UGV

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

Short Term (Tactical | 1-4 Weeks):

Medium Term (Operational | 1-6 Months):

Long Term (Strategic | 1-5 Years):

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

For Private Sector/Investors:

 

Gemini 2.5 Pro cost $0.171718:

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Russia Projects Global Strategic Pivot While Battling Domestic Systemic Strains

DATE: 10 December 2025

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Bottom Line Up Front)

Strategic Synthesis: On December 10, Russian state media projected a dual narrative of expanding geopolitical influence and domestic resilience. The centerpiece of its foreign policy messaging was Defense Minister Shoigu's tour of Vietnam and Laos, explicitly framed as building a counterweight to "embryonic NATO" structures in Asia. This outward-facing confidence was paired with sustained reporting of tactical victories in Ukraine, particularly in the Zaporizhzhia and Dnipropetrovsk regions, emphasizing the successful use of advanced weaponry and the degradation of Ukrainian forces.

This narrative of strength is set against subtle but significant indicators of domestic fragility. Reporting on a severe infrastructure crisis in Kamchatka—where heavy snowfall was followed by floods, isolating communities and requiring federal intervention—highlights systemic weaknesses in regional governance and infrastructure. The state’s response, involving the federal Investigative Committee, points to a pattern of centralized, reactive crisis management. The day’s programming was heavily saturated with historical documentaries on the 1941 Battle of Moscow, explicitly framing the current conflict as an existential struggle against the West, designed to bolster domestic resolve and justify prolonged mobilization.

Key Developments:

  1. Strategic Pivot to Southeast Asia: Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu's high-profile visits to Vietnam and Laos were presented as a major diplomatic success, aimed at deepening military and security ties to counter Western influence in the Asia-Pacific region.
  2. Sustained Offensive in Ukraine: Russian forces are reported to be making steady advances in the Zaporizhzhia direction (notably around Gulyaipole) and have secured the village of Ostapovskoye (Dnipropetrovsk region), indicating a continued grinding offensive aimed at attriting Ukrainian defenses.
  3. Critical Infrastructure Failure in Far East: A weather-related crisis in Kamchatka has exposed significant infrastructure vulnerabilities, disrupting supply lines and requiring high-level federal intervention, undermining the narrative of total state control and competence.
  4. Aggressive Information Operations: Significant airtime was dedicated to discrediting Western political systems. Narratives focused on alleged authoritarianism in Germany (suing citizens for dissent) and the illegitimacy of the U.S. presidency (the "autopen" scandal), aiming to inoculate the domestic audience against Western criticism and portray Russia as a more stable alternative.

Confidence & Sourcing: This assessment is based on a full-day broadcast from TV Zvezda, the official media outlet of the Russian Ministry of Defense. Confidence is high that the events reported (Shoigu's visit, military operations, Kamchatka weather) occurred. Confidence is low in the framing of these events, particularly casualty figures and the portrayal of Ukrainian morale, which are shaped by state propaganda objectives for a domestic, pro-military audience.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)

Geopolitics & Defense: Countering the West in Asia and Europe

The primary geopolitical signal of the day was Russia's assertive pivot to Southeast Asia. Sergey Shoigu's visit to Vietnam and Laos was framed not merely as a diplomatic courtesy but as a foundational step in building a non-Western security architecture in the Asia-Pacific. His statement about countering "embryos of NATO in the East" is a direct challenge to U.S.-led alliances like the Quad and AUKUS. This move aims to demonstrate that Russia is not isolated and can project influence far beyond the European theater, offering security partnerships to nations wary of U.S. hegemony.

In Europe, the narrative is defensive and accusatory. The broadcast highlighted statements by Russian diplomat Vasily Nebenzya, accusing "Euro-hawks" of preparing for a direct war with Russia. Discussions around potential new EU sanctions, particularly a "naval blockade" of Russian oil, were framed as self-destructive acts of "piracy" that would primarily harm European economies (specifically Greece, Malta, and Cyprus). This narrative serves to drive wedges within the EU and portray Western actions as illegal and irrational.

The historical documentary programming on the 1941 Battle of Moscow is a critical component of this narrative. It draws direct parallels between Nazi Germany's invasion and the current conflict, portraying Russia as once again defending itself against an existential threat from a consolidated, hostile Europe. The mention of General Kotlerov's suicide note ("blame the high command for the mess") serves as a subtle historical warning against disunity and incompetence, reinforcing the need for loyalty to the current leadership.

Domestic Stability & Governance: The Kamchatka Failure as a Systemic Indicator

While military operations were presented as successful, the report on the Kamchatka crisis provides a clear counterpoint. The sequence of events—a massive snowstorm followed by warming and floods—is a predictable climate pattern for the region. The resulting collapse of transportation infrastructure, which has cut off the town of Oktyabrsky from essential supplies, is a Strategic Governance Indicator. It suggests chronic underinvestment in regional infrastructure and a failure of local authorities to prepare for and manage foreseeable crises.

The state's response is equally telling. The intervention of the federal Investigative Committee—a law enforcement body—to "take control" of the situation highlights a centralized, top-down approach that often supplants or signals the failure of civilian administrative bodies. This reflects a broader pattern in which the Kremlin relies on its power verticals (siloviki) to manage crises, often after the fact, rather than empowering robust and resilient local governance.

Elite Politics & Internal Fractures: Projecting Western Disarray

The Zvezda broadcast contained no direct evidence of internal Russian political fractures. Instead, it engaged in classic "whataboutism" by dedicating significant segments to portraying deep political crises in the West.

By focusing on these foreign examples, the broadcast reinforces the Kremlin's narrative of a stable, unified Russia standing against a chaotic and hypocritical West.

Economic Statecraft: Technology, Sanctions, and Strategic Resources

Economic news was filtered through a geopolitical lens. The discussion on the EU's potential naval blockade was not treated as an economic threat but as an act of desperation and self-harm. The analysis highlighted the dependency of certain EU members on the maritime transport industry, suggesting Russia believes it can exploit these internal economic contradictions.

Furthermore, a segment on the global shortage of high-end video cards for AI development was framed as part of a broader technological war. It highlighted U.S. efforts to restrict China's access to technology and positioned Russia as a victim of similar policies. This narrative reinforces the Russia-China alignment as a necessary bloc to resist U.S. technological hegemony and sanctions pressure.

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

  1. Diplomatic Implication: Russia is actively courting nations in Southeast Asia that are skeptical of both U.S. and Chinese dominance. The U.S. must intensify its own diplomatic and economic engagement with Vietnam, Laos, and other ASEAN members, emphasizing the benefits of partnership with Washington over alignment with Moscow.
  2. Security Implication: The Russian narrative of countering "NATO in the East" will be used to justify an increased naval and air presence in the Pacific. U.S. INDOPACOM should anticipate more frequent and assertive Russian military activities in the region, coordinated with China.
  3. Information Warfare Implication: Russia is conducting a sustained campaign to undermine the perceived legitimacy of the U.S. government. U.S. agencies must be prepared to actively counter Russian disinformation narratives targeting domestic audiences, particularly those that exploit internal political divisions.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Supply Chain Risk: The demonstrated infrastructure fragility in Russia's Far East poses a significant risk to any ventures reliant on regional transportation networks, including potential future projects related to the Northern Sea Route.
  2. Maritime Security Risk: Russia's framing of Western sanctions as "piracy" and illegal warfare could be used to justify retaliatory actions against Western-flagged or -insured commercial vessels operating in or near Russian waters. Maritime operators should factor this heightened risk of asymmetric retaliation into their planning.

 

And finally, NTV cost $0.182040 with Gemini 3 Pro:

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Kremlin Amplifies Narratives of Western Abandonment of Kyiv; Pivots to Indonesia for Asian Partnership; Tightens Domestic Financial Surveillance.
DATE: December 10, 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Synthesis:
The Kremlin is currently executing a coordinated information campaign designed to project the inevitability of Russian victory in Ukraine while simultaneously tightening domestic control mechanisms. NTV broadcasts from December 10, 2025, heavily emphasize a narrative that the US Administration (specifically referencing President Trump) is forcing Ukraine toward concessions and elections, effectively "liquidating" the Zelenskyy administration politically. Domestically, the Russian state is fortifying its surveillance apparatus, granting financial intelligence units direct access to consumer banking data, likely to curb capital flight and the grey economy. Geopolitically, Moscow is aggressively courting Indonesia to diversify its "Global South" coalition, moving beyond China and India to secure new markets for nuclear energy and military exports.

Key Developments:

Confidence & Sourcing:
High confidence in the occurrence of the Indonesian visit and legislative changes (verifiable state acts). Moderate confidence in specific frontline claims (Ostapovskoye), as NTV reporting is state-curated. The narrative regarding "Trump forcing Zelenskyy to elections" is heavily spun state propaganda intended to demoralize Ukrainian resistance and should be viewed as an information operation rather than a reflection of actual US diplomatic cables.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE

Geopolitics & Defense: The "Asia Pivot" and Fracturing the West

Domestic Stability & Governance: Infrastructure Strain and State Capacity

Economic Statecraft: The Digital Gulag

Elite Politics: Social Engineering

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT

Short Term (1-4 Weeks):

Medium Term (1-6 Months):

Long Term (1-5 Years):

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

  1. Diplomatic Counter-Weight: The US must reinforce engagement with Indonesia to ensure Russian nuclear/military deals do not compromise Pacific security architecture or ASEAN neutrality.
  2. Information Counter-Measures: Clearly communicate US policy regarding Ukraine’s sovereignty to counter the Kremlin’s narrative that Washington is unilaterally forcing elections or territorial concessions.
  3. Sanctions Enforcement: The expansion of Rosfinmonitoring’s powers suggests the Kremlin is closing loopholes. US Treasury should investigate how the "Mir" system interacts with friendly jurisdictions to prevent sanctions evasion via crypto or third-party swaps.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Data Privacy Risk: Any entity operating in Russia or transacting with the "Mir" system must assume total lack of financial privacy. Corporate financial data is now transparent to Russian intelligence services without judicial oversight.
  2. Infrastructure Risk: The pattern of large-scale fires in logistics and retail centers indicates a rising risk to physical assets in Russia due to degrading safety standards and emergency response capabilities. Supply chains relying on Russian transit or warehousing are increasingly vulnerable.

 

And Gemini 2.5 Pro cost $0.148630:

INTELLIGENCE BRIEF HEADER

TITLE: Moscow Amplifies Western Fractures to Mask Widening Domestic Governance Failures
DATE: 10 DECEMBER 2025
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED // OSINT ASSESSMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (BLUF)

Strategic Synthesis: The Kremlin is executing a concerted information offensive, projecting an image of inevitable military victory in Ukraine and ascendant geopolitical influence. State media is heavily amplifying political divisions within the West—particularly through extensive coverage of a Donald Trump interview critical of European allies and Ukrainian leadership—while simultaneously showcasing high-level diplomatic engagement with Global South partners like Indonesia and India. This narrative of external strength serves to distract from and contrast with mounting evidence of domestic state capacity failures. Multiple major infrastructure fires and persistent bureaucratic paralysis at the regional level, inadvertently revealed in state media, underscore the profound strain the war effort is placing on the Russian homeland. Furthermore, the state is tightening its internal grip, with new legislation granting security services unprecedented, direct access to all domestic digital financial transactions, signaling a move towards total financial surveillance.

Key Developments:

  1. Financial Control Solidified: The State Duma passed legislation granting Rosfinmonitoring direct, real-time access to all transactions on the domestic MIR and Faster Payments System (SBP) networks. This move institutionalizes comprehensive financial surveillance over the Russian populace, ostensibly to combat terror financing but practically serving as a powerful tool for capital control, tax enforcement, and suppression of dissent.
  2. Trump Interview Weaponized: State media dedicated significant airtime to an interview with Donald Trump, selectively highlighting his characterization of European leaders as "weak and stupid," his description of President Zelensky as a "salesman," and his skepticism regarding Ukraine's NATO prospects. This is a clear effort to demoralize Ukraine and promote a narrative of collapsing Western unity.
  3. Narrative of Military Dominance: Military reporting from Ukraine remains exclusively positive, claiming tactical advances (Ostapovskoye, Gulyai Polye), destruction of US-made equipment, and portraying Ukrainian forces as demoralized and cruel. This narrative is unsupported by external evidence and serves a domestic propaganda function.
  4. Strategic Governance Failures: Reports on two major fires in a single day at large commercial centers (Ulan-Ude, St. Petersburg) and a feature on a pensioner waiting 62 years for legally mandated housing in Ulan-Ude point to systemic decay in public safety, infrastructure, and regional administrative capacity.
  5. "Global South" Diplomatic Offensive: High-profile coverage was given to President Putin's meeting with Indonesian President Subianto and positive rhetoric surrounding relations with India, reinforcing the narrative that Russia is successfully pivoting away from the West and is not isolated.

Confidence & Sourcing: This assessment is based on a full-day broadcast from NTV, a major state-controlled television channel. All military and geopolitical reporting is considered state propaganda with low confidence in its factual accuracy but high confidence as an indicator of official narratives. Reports on domestic failures, while likely factual, are presented without systemic critique and serve as valuable, albeit unintentional, indicators of governance challenges.

ANALYTIC DEEP DIVE (Thematic Synthesis)

1. Geopolitics & Defense: An Information Offensive Built on Western Cracks

The Kremlin's current foreign policy and military narrative hinges on the erosion of Western political will. The disproportionate focus on Donald Trump's interview is the primary tool. By broadcasting his critiques of NATO and European leadership, Moscow aims to achieve three objectives: 1) Encourage isolationist sentiment in the US electorate; 2) Sow discord between the US and its European allies; and 3) Demoralize Ukrainian leadership and society by suggesting their primary benefactor may soon abandon them.

Foreign Minister Lavrov's speech to the Federation Council complements this by framing the West as financially exhausted and ideologically blind, claiming their only remaining option is the "theft" of frozen Russian assets. This narrative portrays Russia as the victim of Western desperation.

Simultaneously, the diplomatic track with the "Global South" is emphasized to demonstrate that Western isolation has failed. The cordial meeting with Indonesia's President and references to a "$100 billion" trade target with India are presented as evidence of a successful pivot to a new, multipolar world order where Russia is a respected leader. The military reports from Ukraine, depicting relentless forward momentum and a morally bankrupt enemy, serve as the kinetic underpinning for this confident diplomatic posture. The branding of the Vostok military grouping as the "Eastern Express" suggests a new effort to create heroic mythologies around the war effort.

2. Domestic Stability & Governance: The Cost of a Forever War Emerges

Beneath the polished surface of geopolitical confidence, the state's capacity to manage its own territory is showing significant strain.

3. Elite Politics & Internal Fractures: Tightening Control Through Financial Surveillance

While this broadcast transcript contains no direct evidence of elite infighting, the new Rosfinmonitoring law is a powerful tool for enforcing elite loyalty and preventing internal challenges. By gaining frictionless access to the financial data of every citizen and entity using domestic payment systems, the state security apparatus can:

4. Economic Statecraft: Projecting Moral and Economic Superiority

The broadcast featured a segment on an American family who immigrated to Nizhny Novgorod, citing a desire for "traditional values" and a better society for their children. This is a recurring soft-power narrative intended to portray Russia as a moral bulwark against a perceived decadent and decaying West. By showcasing Westerners who "choose" Russia, the state seeks to validate its conservative, nationalist ideology and attract like-minded individuals, creating a small but symbolically powerful counter-narrative to Russia's brain drain. This is a form of ideological statecraft aimed at both domestic and international audiences sympathetic to conservative social views.

STRATEGIC FORESIGHT (Time-Boxed Analysis)

RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLICATIONS

For US Policy:

  1. Security Implication: The new financial surveillance law will significantly complicate US intelligence efforts to track sanctions evasion, illicit financial networks, and funding for opposition elements within Russia. US financial intelligence agencies must develop new methods that do not rely on the formal domestic banking system.
  2. Diplomatic Implication: The US must proactively counter Russia's "Global South" narrative. Diplomatic engagement should emphasize the domestic costs of Russia's war—citing evidence of its decaying infrastructure and administrative failures—to demonstrate that partnership with Moscow comes at a high price to its own people.
  3. Political Implication: The Kremlin is clearly preparing its information space and policy for a potential Trump administration. US policy must develop bipartisan continuity plans for supporting Ukraine to mitigate the shock of a potential shift in US posture, which Moscow is actively banking on.

For Private Sector/Investors:

  1. Compliance & Asset Risk: Any entity with remaining financial interests or operations in Russia must assume total transparency to the Russian state. The risk of assets being frozen or seized for political or arbitrary tax reasons has increased exponentially. The concept of financial privacy in Russia is now defunct.
  2. Operational & Safety Risk: The repeated instances of major infrastructure failure indicate a deteriorating operational environment. Businesses with physical assets in Russia face heightened risks of disruption from utility failures, transportation breakdowns, and industrial accidents. Safety standards cannot be assumed to meet international norms.